References

  1. N. Cicek, J.P. Franco, M.T. Suidan, V. Urbain, J. Manem, Characterization and comparison of a membrane bioreactor and a conventional activated-sludge system in the treatment of wastewater containing high molecular weight compounds, Water Environ. Res., 71 (1999) 64–70.
  2. J. Jimenez, P. Grelier, J. Meinhold, A. Tazi-Pain, Biological modelling of MBR and impact of primary sedimentation, Desalination, 250 (2010) 562–567.
  3. A. Santos, W. Ma, S.J. Judd, Membrane bioreactors: Two decades of research and implementation, Desalination, 273 (2011) 148–154.
  4. A. Fenu, J. Roels, T. Wambecq, K. De Gussem, C. Thoeye, G. De Gueldre, B. Van De Steene, Energy audit of a full scale MBR system, Desalination, 262 (2010) 121–128.
  5. M. Henze, Activated sludge models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3, IWA Scientific and Tech. Rep., (2000).
  6. R. Brun, M. Kühni, H. Siegrist, W. Gujer, P. Reichert, Practical identifiability of ASM2d parameters—systematic selection and tuning of parameter subsets, Water Res., 36 (2002) 4113– 4127.
  7. J. Keskitalo, K. Leiviskä, Application of evolutionary optimisers in data-based calibration of activated sludge models, Expert Syst. Appl., 39 (2012) 6609–6617.
  8. W. Chen, X. Lu, C. Yao, G. Zhu, Z. Xu, An efficient approach based on bi-sensitivity analysis and genetic algorithm for calibration of activated sludge models, Chem. Eng. J., 259 (2015) 845–853.
  9. J.L. Tambosi, R.F.d. Sena, M. Favier, W. Gebhardt, H.J. José, H.F. Schröder, R.d.F.P.M. Moreira, Removal of pharmaceutical compounds in membrane bioreactors (MBR) applying submerged membranes, Desalination, 261 (2010) 148–156.
  10. J. Sipma, B. Osuna, N. Collado, H. Monclús, G. Ferrero, J. Comas, I. Rodriguez-Roda, Comparison of removal of pharmaceuticals in MBR and activated sludge systems, Desalination, 250 (2010) 653–659.
  11. M. Aubenneau, A. Tahar, C. Casellas, C. Wisniewski, Membrane bioreactor for pharmaceutically active compounds removal: Effects of carbamazepine on mixed microbial communities implied in the treatment, Process Biochem., 45 (2010) 1826–1831.
  12. J. Radjenović, M. Petrović, D. Barceló, Fate and distribution of pharmaceuticals in wastewater and sewage sludge of the conventional activated sludge (CAS) and advanced membrane bioreactor (MBR) treatment, Water Res., 43 (2009) 831–841.
  13. C. McArdell, L. Kovalova, H. Siegrist, C. Kienle, R. Moser, T. Schwartz, Input and elimination of pharmaceuticals and disinfectants from hospital wastewater. Final project report., in Eawag: Das Wasserforschungs-Institut des ETH-Bereichs, Duebendorf, Switzerland, 2011.
  14. I. Quesada, Y. Gonzalez, S. Schetrite, H. Budzinski, K. Le Menach, O. Lorain, N. Manier, S. Ait Aissa, P. Pandard, D. Abdelaziz, PANACÉE: évaluation du fonctionnement d’un bioréacteur à membranes immergées traitant des effluents hospitaliers d’oncologie, J. Water Sci., 28 (2015) 1–6.
  15. J. Svojitka, L. Dvor, M. Studer, J.O. Straub, H. Frömelt, T. Wintgens, Performance of an anaerobic membrane bioreactor for pharmaceutical wastewater treatment, Bioresour. Technol., 229 (2017) 180–189.
  16. A.S. Çığgın, G. Insel, M. Majone, D. Orhon, Respirometric evaluation and modelling of acetate utilization in sequencing batch reactor under pulse and continuous feeding, Bioresour. Technol., 107 (2012) 61–69.
  17. M.C. Collivignarelli, G. Bertanza, A. Abbà, V. Torretta, I.A. Katsoyiannis, Wastewater treatment by means of thermophilic aerobic membrane reactors: respirometric tests and numerical models for the determination of stoichiometric/kinetic parameters, Environ. Technol., (2017) 1–10.
  18. M. Capodici, G. Di Bella, D. Di Trapani, M. Torregrossa, G. Viviani, Respirometry for the characterization of heterotrophic biomass activity: application to a MBR pilot plant operated with two different start-up strategies, J. Environ Eng., 142 (2015) 06015009.
  19. D. Di Trapani, M. Capodici, A. Cosenza, G. Di Bella, G. Mannina, M. Torregrossa, G. Viviani, Evaluation of biomass activity and wastewater characterization in a UCT-MBR pilot plant by means of respirometric techniques, Desalination, 269 (2011) 190–197.
  20. B. Vivekanandan, A.S. Rao, Estimation of yield, growth rate, decay rate, and half-saturation coefficients of ASM1 model parameters, Int. J. Environ. Res., 11 (2017) 415–423.
  21. M. Van Loosdrecht, M. Pot, J. Heijnen, Importance of bacterial storage polymers in bioprocesses, Water Sci. Technol., 35 (1997) 41–47.
  22. Y. Biros, E.U. Çokgör, N. Yağcı, I. Pala-Ozkok, Z.P. Çakar, S. Sözen, D. Orhon, Effect of acetate to biomass ratio on simultaneous polyhydroxybutyrate generation and direct microbial growth in fast growing microbial culture, Bioresour. Technol., 171 (2014) 314–322.
  23. M. Van Aalst-van Leeuwen, M. Pot, M. Van Loosdrecht, J. Heijnen, Kinetic modeling of poly(-hydroxybutyrate) production and consumption by Paracoccus pantotrophus under dynamic substrate supply, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 55 (1997) 773–782.
  24. C. Krishna, M.C. Van Loosdrecht, Substrate flux into storage and growth in relation to activated sludge modeling, Water Res., 33 (1999) 3149–3161.
  25. M. Beccari, D. Dionisi, A. Giuliani, M. Majone, R. Ramadori, Effect of different carbon sources on aerobic storage by activated sludge, Water Sci. Technol., 45 (2002) 157–168.
  26. M. Van Loosdrecht, J. Heijnen, Modelling of activated sludge processes with structured biomass, Water Sci. Technol., 45 (2002) 13–23.
  27. Ö. Karahan-Gül, M. Van Loosdrecht, D. Orhon, Modification of activated sludge model no. 3 considering direct growth on primary substrate, Water Sci. Technol., 47 (2003) 219–225.
  28. A. Guisasola, G. Sin, J. Baeza, J. Carrera, P. Vanrolleghem, Limitations of ASM1 and ASM3: a comparison based on batch oxygen uptake rate profiles from different full-scale wastewater treatment plants, Water Sci. Technol., 52 (2005) 69–77.
  29. J. Fan, P.A. Vanrolleghem, S. Lu, Z. Qiu, Modification of the kinetics for modeling substrate storage and biomass growth mechanism in activated sludge system under aerobic condition, Chem. Eng. Sci., 78 (2012) 75–81.
  30. Ö. Karahan, M. van Loosdrecht, D. Orhon, Modeling the utilization of starch by activated sludge for simultaneous substrate storage and microbial growth, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 94 (2006) 43–53.
  31. F. Gao, J. Nan, X. Zhang, Simulating a cyclic activated sludge system by employing a modified ASM3 model for wastewater treatment, Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng., 40 (2017) 877–890.
  32. P.A. Vanrolleghem, H. Spanjers, B. Petersen, P. Ginestet, I. Takacs, Estimating (combinations of) activated sludge model No. 1 parameters and components by respirometry, Water Sci. Technol., 39 (1999) 195–214.
  33. P.A. Vanrolleghem, G. Insel, B. Petersen, G. Sin, D. De Pauw, I. Nopens, H. Dovermann, S. Weijers, K. Gernaey, A comprehensive model calibration procedure for activated sludge models, Proc. Water Environ. Fed., 2003 (2003) 210–237.
  34. J. Beun, F. Paletta, M. Van Loosdrecht, J. Heijnen, Stoichiometry and kinetics of poly-b-hydroxybutyrate metabolism in aerobic, slow growing, activated sludge cultures, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 67 (2000) 379–389.
  35. A. Nuhoglu, B. Keskinler, E. Yildiz, Mathematical modelling of the activated sludge process - the Erzincan case, Process Biochem., 40 (2005) 2467–2473.
  36. N. Bing-Jie, Y. Han-Qing, Simulation of heterotrophic storage and growth processes in activated sludge under aerobic conditions, Chem. Eng. J., 140 (2008) 101–109.
  37. O. Karahan, D. Orhon, M.C. van Loosdrecht, Simultaneous storage and utilization of polyhydroxyalkanoates and glycogen under aerobic conditions, Water Sci. Technol., 58 (2008) 945–951.
  38. M. Ferrai, G. Guglielmi, G. Andreottola, Modelling respirometric tests for the assessment of kinetic and stoichiometric parameters on MBBR biofilm for municipal wastewater treatment, Environ. Model. Softw., 25 (2010) 626–632.
  39. J. Fan, Y. Ding, Z. Qiu, W. Li, S. Lu, Development of mechanistically based model for simulating soluble microbial products generation in an aerated/non-aerated SBR, Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng., 34 (2011) 1151.
  40. T. Jiang, X. Liu, M. Kennedy, J. Schippers, P. Vanrolleghem, Calibrating a side-stream membrane bioreactor using activated sludge model No. 1, Water Sci. Technol., 52 (2005) 359–367.
  41. G. Sin, A. Guisasola, D.J. De Pauw, J.A. Baeza, J. Carrera, P.A. Vanrolleghem, A new approach for modelling simultaneous storage and growth processes for activated sludge systems under aerobic conditions, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 92 (2005) 600– 613.
  42. U. Strotmann, A. Geldem, A. Kuhn, C. Gendig, S. Klein, Evaluation of a respirometric test method to determine the heterotrophic yield coefficient of activated sludge bacteria, Chemosphere, 38 (1999) 3555–3570.
  43. A. Zarragoitia-González, Desarrollo de modelos dinamicos para la simulacion y optimizacion de biorreactores con membrana sumergida para el tratamiento de aguas residuales, in: Biosym, Université de Toulouse, France, 2009.
  44. L.F. Delgado, S. Schetrite, C. Gonzalez, C. Albasi, Effect of cytostatic drugs on microbial behaviour in membrane bioreactor system, Bioresour. Technol., 101 (2010) 527–536.
  45. P.A. Vanrolleghem, K. Gernaey, B. Petersen, B. De Clercq, F. Coen, J.-P. Ottoy, Limitations of short-term experiments designed for identification of activated sludge biodegradation models by fast dynamic phenomena, IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 31 (1998) 535–540.