References
- M. Ulbricht, Advanced functional polymer membranes, Polymer,
47 (2016) 2217–2262.
- J.C. Crittenden, R.R. Trussell, D.W. Hand, K.J. Howe, G. Tchobanoglous,
MWH’s Water Treatment: Principles and Design,
John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, 2012.
- X. Zheng, M. Yu, H. Liang, L. Qi, H. Zheng, H. Exler, W. Schier,
F.-B. Frechen, Membrane technology for municipal drinking
water plants in China: progress and prospect, Desal. Wat. Treat.,
49 (2012) 281–295.
- M. Erkanlı, L. Yilmaz, P.Z. Çulfaz-Emecen, U. Yetis, Brackish
water recovery from reactive dyeing wastewater via ultrafiltration,
J. Cleaner Prod., 165 (2017) 1204–1214.
- A. Erbasi, A. Can, K. Cinar, The use of the AHP method in
the selection of the most appropriate production materials by
businesses: a sample study on tractor body materials, J. Adv.
Manage. Sci., 1 (2013) 152–155.
- C. Alavala, Fuzzy Logic and Neural Networks, New Age
International, India, 2014.
- D. Dalalah, M. Hayajneh, F. Batieha, A fuzzy multi-criteria
descision making model for supplier selection, Expert Syst.
Appl., 38 (2011) 8384–8391.
- D.-Y. Chang, Applications of the extent analysis method on
fuzzy AHP, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 95 (1996) 649–655.
- Z. Srdjevic, M. Samardzic, B. Srdjevic, Robustness of AHP in
selecting wastewater treatment method for the coloured metal
industry: Serbian case study, Civ. Eng. Environ. Syst., 29 (2012)
147–161.
- R.R. Tan, K.B. Aviso, A.P. Huelgas, M.A.B. Promentilla, Fuzzy
AHP approach to selection problems in process engineering
involving quanitative and qualitative aspects, Process Saf.
Environ. Prot., 92 (2014) 467–475.
- J.Z. Ren, A. Fedele, M. Mason, A. Manzardo, A. Scipioni, Fuzzy
multi-actor multi-criteria decision making for sustainability
assessment of biomass-based technologies for hydrogen
production, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 38 (2013) 9111–9120.
- S.M.K. Sadr, D.P. Saroj, S. Kouchaki, A.A. Ilemobade, S.K. Ouki,
A group decision-making tool for the application of membrane
technologies in different water reuse scenarios, J. Environ.
Manage., 156 (2015) 97–108.
- G. Büyüközkan, C. Kahraman, D. Ruan, A fuzzy multi-criteria
decision approach for software development strategy selection,
Int. J. Gen. Syst., 33 (2004) 259–280.
- O. Kilincci, S.A. Onal, Fuzzy AHP approach for supplier
selection in a washing machine company, Expert Syst. Appl.,
38 (2011) 9656–9664.
- L. Anojkumar, M. Ilangkumaran, V. Sasirekha, Comparative
analysis of MCDM methods for pipe material selection in sugar
industry, Expert Syst. Appl., 41 (2014) 2964–2980.
- P. Manekar, T. Nandy, A. Sargaonkar, B. Rathi, M. Karthik, FAHP
ranking and selection of pretreatment module for membrane
separation processes in textile cluster, Bioresour. Technol., 102
(2011) 558–566.
- G. Büyüközkan, O. Feyzioglu, A fuzzy-logic-based decisionmaking
approach for new product development, Int. J. Prod.
Econ., 90 (2004) 27–45.
- T. Saaty, The Analytical Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill,
New York, 1980.
- E. Bulut, O. Duru, T. Keçeci, S. Yoshida, Use of consistency
index, expert prioritization and direct numerical inputs for
generic fuzzy-AHP modeling: a process model for shipping
asset management, Expert Syst. Appl., 39 (2012) 1911–1923.
- W. van Leekwijck, E.E. Kerre, Defuzzification: criteria and
classification, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 108 (1999) 159–178.
- C.-W. Chang, C.-R. Wu, H.-L. Lin, Applying fuzzy hierarchy
multiple attributes to construct an expert decision making
process, Expert Syst. Appl., 36 (2009) 7363–7368.
- J.-F. Chen, H.-N. Hsieh, Q.H. Do, Evaluating teaching
performance based on fuzzy AHP and comprehensive evaluation
approach, Appl. Soft Comput., 28 (2015) 100–108.
- T.L. Saaty, Decision-making with the AHP: why is the principal
eigenvector necessary, J. Oper. Res., 145 (2003) 85–91.