References

  1. J. Jacquemin, D. Bhatia, K. Singh, R.A. Wing, The international Oryza map alignment project: development of a genus-wide comparative genomics platform to help solve the 9 billionpeople question, Curr. Opin. Plant Biol., 16 (2013) 147–156.
  2. J.Z. Koehn, E.H. Allison, N. Franz, E.S. Wiegers, Eds., Chapter 4 - How Can the Oceans help feed 9 Billion people?, P. Levin, M.R. Poe, Eds., Conservation for the Anthropocene Ocean: Interdisciplinary Science in Support of Nature and People, ProQuest Ebook Central, Elsevier, Science & Technology, Washington, 2017, pp. 65–88. Available at: http://ebookcentral. proquest.com/lib/washington/detail.action?docID=4871125
  3. G. Salmoral, N.C.E. Schaap, J. Walschebauer, A. Alhajaj, W Water diplomacy and nexus governance in a transboundary context: in the search for complementarities, Sci. Total Environ., 690 (2019) 85–98.
  4. R. Roson, M. Sartori, System-wide implications of changing water availability and agricultural productivity in the Mediterranean economies, Water Econ. Policy, 1 (2014) 145000–1 – 145000–30.
  5. O.K. Tran, D. Jassby, K.A. Schwabe, The implications of drought and water conservation on the reuse of municipal wastewater: recognizing impacts and identifying mitigation possibilities, Water Res., 124 (2017) 472–481.
  6. R. Birks, S. Hills, Characterization of indicator organisms and pathogens in domestic greywater for recycling, Environ. Monit. Assess., 129 (2007) 61–69.
  7. K.-W. Shi, C.-W. Wang, S.C. Jiang, Quantitative microbial risk assessment of greywater on-site reuse, Sci. Total Environ., 635 (2018) 1507–1519.
  8. R.V. Linares, Z. Li, S. Sarp, S. Bucs, G. Amy, J.S. Vrouwenvehlder, Forward osmosis niches in seawater desalination and wastewater reuse, Water Res., 66 (2014) 122–139.
  9. R.C. Eusebio, M.A. Promentilla, H.S. Kim, Optimization of forward osmosis system for the utilization of reverse osmosis brine, Desal. Wat. Treat., 57 (2016) 27899–27904.
  10. D. Penna, J. Geris, L. Hopp, F. Scandellari, Water sources for root water uptake: using stable isotopes of hydrogen and oxygen as a research tool in agricultural and agroforestry systems, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 291 (2020) 106790.
  11. V.F. Velho, R.A. Mohedano, P.B. Filho, R.H.R. Costa, The viability of treated piggery wastewater for reuse in agricultural irrigation, Int. J. Recycl. Org. Waste Agric., 1 (2012) 1–9.
  12. S.C. Jhansi, M.S. Campus, S.K. Mishra, Wastewater treatment and reuse: sustainability options, Consilience: J. Sustainable Dev., 10 (2013) 1–15.
  13. X. Quyang, F. Guo, Intuitionistic fuzzy analytical hierarchical processes for selecting the paradigms of mangroves in municipal wastewater treatment, Chemosphere, 197 (2018) 634–642.
  14. M.F. Chislock, E. Doster, R.A. Zitomer, A.F. Wilson, Eutrophication: causes, consequences, and controls in aquatic ecosystems, Nat. Educ. Knowledge, 4 (2013) 8.
  15. J. Herrero, O. Perez-Coveta, Salinity changes over 24 years in a Mediterranean irrigated district, Geoderma, 125 (2005) 287–308.
  16. O. Mounzer, F. Pedrero-Salcedo, P.A. Nortes, J.M. Bayona, E. Nicolás-Nicolás, J.J. Alarcón, Transient soil salinity under the combined effect of reclaimed water and regulated deficit drip irrigation of Mandarin trees, Agric. Water Manage., 120 (2013) 23–29.
  17. E. Giannakopoulos, E. Isari, K. Bourikas, H.K. Karapanagioti, G. Psarras, G. Oron, I.K. Kalavrouziotis, Oxidation of municipal wastewater by free radicals mechanism: a UV/Vis spectroscopy study, J. Environ. Manage., 195 (2017) 186–194.
  18. T.A. Ternes, M. Bonerz, N. Herrmann, B. Teiser, H.R. Andersen, Irrigation of treated wastewater in Braunschweig, Germany: an option to remove pharmaceuticals and musk fragrances, Chemosphere, 66 (2007) 894–904.
  19. D. Coles, D. Yu, R.L. Wilby, D. Green, Z. Herring, Beyond ‘flood hotspots’: modelling emergency service accessibility during flooding in York, UK, J. Hydrol., 546 (2017) 419–436.
  20. G. Ettritch, A. Hardy, L. Bojang, D. Cross, P. Bunting, P. Brewer, Enhancing digital elevation models for hydraulic modelling using flood frequency detection, Remote Sens. Environ., 217 (2018) 506–522.
  21. C.A. Varotsos, M.N. Efstathiou, Has global warming already arrived?, J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys., 182 (2019) 31–38.
  22. J. Zhang, Y. Tengfei, Y. Zhongqi, J.Z. Si, Transforming flash floods into resources in arid China, Land Use Policy, 76 (2018) 746–753.
  23. A.S. Rahman, K. Haddad, A. Rahman, Regional Flood Modelling in the New Australian Rainfall and Runoff, 20th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, Adelaide, Australia, 1–6 December 2013.
  24. J.M. Lázaro, J.A.S. Navarro, A.G. Gil, V.E. Romero, Flood frequency analysis (FFA) in Spanish catchments, J. Hydrol., 538 (2016) 598–608.
  25. T. Schendel, R. Thongwichian, Considering historical flood events in flood frequency analysis: is it worth the effort?, Adv. Water Resour., 105 (2017) 144–153.
  26. L. Collet, L. Beevers, M.D. Stewart, Decision‐making and flood risk uncertainty: statistical data set analysis for flood risk assessment, Water Resour. Res., 54 (2018) 7291–7308.
  27. A. Goonetilleke, A. Liu, S. Managi, C. Wilson, T. Gardner, E.R. Bandala, L. Walker, J. Holden, M.A. Wibowo, S. Suripin, H. Joshi, D.M. Bonotto, D. Rajapaksa, Stormwater reuse, a viable option: fact or fiction?, Econ. Anal. Policy, 56 (2017) 14–17.
  28. R.W. Holloway, R. Maltos, J. Vanneste, T.Y. Cath, Mixed draw solutions for improved forward osmosis performance, J. Membr. Sci., 491 (2015) 121–131.
  29. D.J. Johnsona, W.A. Suwaileh, A.W. Mohammed, N. Hilal, Osmotic’s potential: an overview of draw solutes for forward osmosis, Desalination, 434 (2018) 100–120.
  30. A. Smith, Nanotech- the way forward for clean water?, Filtr. Sep., 43 (2006) 32–33.
  31. A. Drews, Membrane fouling in membrane bioreactorscharacterization, contradictions, cause and cures, J. Membr. Sci., 363 (2019) 1–28.
  32. R-S. Wu, G.L.L. Molina, F. Hussain, Optimal sites identification for rainwater harvesting in northeastern Guatemala by analytical hierarchy process, Water Resour. Manage., 32 (2018) 4139–4153.
  33. X. Qu, P.J.J. Alvarez, Q. Li, Applications of nanotechnology in water and wastewater treatment, Water Res., 47 (2013) 3931–3946.
  34. W. Xue, C. Wu, K. Xiao, Elimination and fate of selected microorganic pollutant in a full-scale anaerobic/anoxic/aerobic process combined with membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewaters reclamation, Water Res., 44 (2010) 5999–6010.
  35. J.S. Guest, S.J. Skerlos, J.L. Barnard, M.B. Beck, G.T. Daigger, H. Hilger, S.J. Jackson, K. Karvazy, L. Kelly, L. Macpherson, J.R. Mihelcic, A. Pramanik, L. Raskin, M.C.M. Van-Loosdrecht, D. Yeh, N.G. Love, A new planning and design paradigm to achieve sustainable resource recovery from wastewater, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43 (2009) 6126–6130.
  36. Y. Ghalavand, M.S. Hatamipour, A. Rahimi, A review on energy consumption of desalination processes, Desal. Wat. Treat., 54 (2015) 1526–1541.
  37. A. Pérez-González, A.M. Urtiaga, R. Ibáñez, I. Ortiz, State of the art and review on the treatment technologies of water reverse osmosis concentrates-review article, Water Res., 46 (2012) 267–283.
  38. J. Hokkanen, P. Salminen, ELECTRE ELECTRE-III and IV decision aids in an environmental problem, J. Multi-Crit. Decis. Anal., 6 (1997) 215–226.
  39. S.S. Hashemi, S.H. Razavi-Hajiagha, M. Amiri, Decisionmaking with unknown data: development of ELECTRE method based on black numbers, Informatica, 25 (2014) 21–36.
  40. J. Ren, Technology selection for ballast water treatment by multistakeholders: a multi-attribute decision analysis approach based on the combined weights and extension theory, Chemosphere, 191 (2018) 747–760.
  41. M. Marzouk, B. Mohamed, Integrated agent-based simulation and multi-criteria decision-making approach for buildings evacuation evaluation, Saf. Sci., 112 (2019) 57–65.
  42. M. Rogers, M. Bruen, Choosing realistic value of indifference, preference and veto thresholds for use with environmental criteria within ELECTRE, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 107 (1998) 542–551.
  43. J. Hokkanen, P. Salminen, Theory and methodology choosing a solid waste management system using multi-criteria decision analysis, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 98 (1997) 19–36.
  44. T.L. Saaty Decision-making with the analytic hierarchy process, Int. Services Sci., 1 (2008) 83–98.
  45. K.D. Young, D.F. Kibler, B.L. Benham, G.V. Loganathan, Application of the analytical hierarchical process for improved selection of storm-water BMPs, J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 135 (2009) 264–275.
  46. H. Sun, S. Wang, X. Hao, An improved analytic hierarchy process method for the evaluation of agricultural water management in irrigation districts of north China, Agric. Water Manage., 179 (2017) 324–337.
  47. A. Hadipour, T. Rajaee, V. Hadipour, S. Seidirad, Multi-criteria decision-making model for wastewater reuse application: a case study from Iran, Desal. Wat. Treat., 57 (2016) 13857–13864.
  48. I. Aşchilean, G. Badea, I. Giurca, G.S. Naghiu, F.G. Iloaie, Choosing the optimal technology to rehabilitate the pipes in water distribution systems using the AHP method, Energy Procedia, 112 (2018) 19–26.
  49. I. Ahmad, M.K. Verma, Application of analytic hierarchy process in water resources planning: a GIS based approach in the identification of suitable site for water storage, Water Resour. Manage., 32 (2018) 5093–5114.
  50. H. David, R. Veinberg, Assessing the Worthiness of Constructing Desalination Plants on Platforms in the Sea in Order to Maintain the Coastal Strip for the Public: The Hedonic Method, Final Project Submitted to the Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, June 2012, p. 47.