References

  1. M. Hssaisoune, L. Bouchaou, A. Sifeddine, I. Bouimetarhan, A. Chehbouni, Moroccan groundwater resources and evolution with global climate changes, Geosciences, 10 (2020) 81, doi: 10.3390/geosciences10020081.
  2. B. Singh, E. Craswell, Fertilizers and nitrate pollution of surface and ground water: an increasingly pervasive global problem, SN Appl. Sci., 3 (2021) 518, doi: 10.1007/s42452-021-04521-8.
  3. F.D. Belkada, O. Kitous, N. Drouiche, S. Aoudj, O. Bouchelaghem, N. Abdi, H. Grib, N. Mameri, Electrodialysis for fluoride and nitrate removal from synthesized photovoltaic industry wastewater, Sep. Purif. Technol., 204 (2018) 108–115.
  4. T. Kikhavani, S.N. Ashrafizadeh, B. Van Der Bruggen, Nitrate selectivity and transport properties of a novel anion exchange membrane in electrodialysis, Electrochim. Acta, 144 (2014) 341–351.
  5. S. Nicolas, L. Guihard, A. Marchand, B. Bariou, A. Amrane, A. Mazighi, N. Mameri, A. El Midaoui, Defluoridation of brackish northern Sahara groundwater — activity product calculations in order to optimize pretreatment before reverse osmosis, Desalination, 256 (2010) 9–15.
  6. L.J. Banasiak, A.I. Schäfer, Removal of boron, fluoride and nitrate by electrodialysis in the presence of organic matter, J. Membr. Sci., 334 (2009) 101–109.
  7. N.S. Bryan, J. Loscalzo, Eds., Nitrite and Nitrate in Human Health and Disease, Nutrition and Health, Humana Cham, 2017, USA, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-46189-2.
  8. R. Epsztein, O. Nir, O. Lahav, M. Green, Selective nitrate removal from groundwater using a hybrid nanofiltration– reverse osmosis filtration scheme, Chem. Eng. J., 279 (2015) 372–378.
  9. A. Elmidaoui, M.A. Menkouchi Sahli, M. Tahaikt, L. Chay, M. Taky, M. Elmghari, M. Hafsi, Selective nitrate removal by coupling electrodialysis and a bioreactor, Desalination, 153 (2003) 389–397.
  10. M. Tahaikt, A. Ait Haddou, R. El Habbani, Z. Amor, F. Elhannouni, M. Taky, M. Kharif, A. Boughriba, M. Hafsi, A. Elmidaoui, Comparison of the performances of three commercial membranes in fluoride removal by nanofiltration. Continuous operations, Desalination, 225 (2008) 209–219.
  11. R. Bonner, C. Germishuizen, S. Franzsen, Prediction of nanofiltration rejection performance in brackish water reverse osmosis brine treatment processes, J. Water Process Eng., 32 (2019) 100900, doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.100900.
  12. G. Vaseghi, A. Ghassemi, J. Loya, Characterization of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes: effects of operating conditions and specific ion rejection, Desal. Water Treat., 57 (2016) 23461–23472.
  13. H. Zeggar, J. Touir, S. El-Ghzizel, F. Elazhar, M. Tahaikt, D. Dhiba, A. Elmidaoui, M. Taky, Characterization of ion transfer and modeling of fouling in nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes, Desal. Water Treat., 240 (2021) 2–13.
  14. H.N. Alavijeh, M. Sadeghi, A. Ghahremanfard, Experimental and economic evaluation of nitrate removal by a nanofiltration membrane, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 30 (2023) 40783–40798.
  15. S. El-Ghzizel, H. Zeggar, M. Tahaikt, F. Tiyal, A. Elmidaoui, M. Taky, Nanofiltration process combined with electrochemical disinfection for drinking water production: feasibility study and optimization, J. Water Process Eng., 36 (2020) 101225, doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101225.
  16. J.J. Schoeman, A. Steyn, Nitrate removal with reverse osmosis in a rural area in South Africa, Desalination, 155 (2003) 15–26.
  17. M. Mourabet, A. El Rhilassi, M. Bennani-Ziatni, A. Taitai, Comparative study of artificial neural network and response surface methodology for modelling and optimization the adsorption capacity of fluoride onto apatitic tricalcium phosphate, Univers. J. Appl. Math., 2 (2014) 84–91.
  18. F.Z. Addar, M. Farah, M. Belfaquir, M. Tahaikt, M. Taky, A. Elmidaoui, Comparison of response surface method and artificial neural network in predicting fluoride removal by nanofiltration, Desal. Water Treat., 297 (2023) 215–226.
  19. H. Abadikhah, F. Zokaee Ashtiani, A. Fouladitajar, Nanofiltration of oily wastewater containing salt; experimental studies and optimization using response surface methodology, Desal. Water Treat., 56 (2015) 2783–2796.
  20. M. Khayet, M.N. Abu Seman, N. Hilal, Response surface modeling and optimization of composite nanofiltration modified membranes, J. Membr. Sci., 349 (2010) 113–122.
  21. F.Z. Addar, S. Qaid, H. Zeggar, H. El Hajji, M. Tahaikt, A. Elmidaoui, M. Taky, Ultrafiltration of Moroccan Valencia orange juice: juice quality, optimization by custom designs and membrane fouling, Sustainable Agric. Food Environ. Res., 11 (2023) 1–21, doi: 10.7770/safer-V11N1-art2722.
  22. M. Hojjat Ansari, J. Basiri Parsa, J. Arjomandi, Application of conducting polyaniline, o-anisidine, o-phenetidine and o-chloroaniline in removal of nitrate from water via electrically switching ion exchange: modeling and optimization using a response surface methodology, Sep. Purif. Technol., 179 (2017) 104–117.
  23. S. Archin, S.H. Sharifi, G. Asadpour, Optimization and modeling of simultaneous ultrasound-assisted adsorption of binary dyes using activated carbon from tobacco residues: response surface methodology, J. Cleaner Prod., 239 (2019) 118136, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118136.
  24. K. Rajkumar, M. Muthukumar, Response surface optimization of electro-oxidation process for the treatment of C.I. Reactive Yellow 186 dye: reaction pathways, Appl. Water Sci., 7 (2017) 637–652.
  25. M. Kumari, S.K. Gupta, Response surface methodological (RSM) approach for optimizing the removal of trihalomethanes (THMs) and its precursor’s by surfactant modified magnetic nanoadsorbents (sMNP) - an endeavor to diminish probable cancer risk, Sci. Rep., 9 (2019) 18339, doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54902-8.
  26. L. Yahia Cherif, I. Yahiaoui, F. Aissani-Benissad, K. Madi, N. Benmehdi, F. Fourcade, A. Amrane, Heat attachment method for the immobilization of TiO2 on glass plates: application to photodegradation of basic yellow dye and optimization of operating parameters, using response surface methodology, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 53 (2014) 3813–3819.
  27. S.V. Jadhav, K.V. Marathe, V.K. Rathod, A pilot scale concurrent removal of fluoride, arsenic, sulfate and nitrate by using nanofiltration: competing ion interaction and modelling approach, J. Water Process Eng., 13 (2016) 153–167.
  28. A. Srivastava, K. Aghilesh, A. Nair, S. Ram, S. Agarwal, J. Ali, R. Singh, M.C. Garg, Response surface methodology and artificial neural network modelling for the performance evaluation of pilot-scale hybrid nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) membrane system for the treatment of brackish ground water, J. Environ. Manage., 278 (2021) 111497, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111497.
  29. B. Bouya, M. Faouzi, M. Ben Abbou, A. Essahlaoui, M. Bahir, N. Youbi, M.A. Hessane, The coastal aquifer of Mnasra (Gharb, Morocco): hydrogeology and hydrodynamic modelling, Commun. Geol., 98 (2011) 73–81.
  30. D. Michel, H. El Kehal, Le littoral du Gharb: littoralisation, adaptation, adaptabilité, 2014, pp. 46–56.
  31. F.Z. Addar, S. El-Ghzizel, M. Tahaikt, M. Belfaquir, M. Taky, A. Elmidaoui, Fluoride removal by nanofiltration: experimentation, modelling and prediction based on the surface response method, Desal. Water Treat., 240 (2021) 75–88.
  32. M. Tahaikt, R. El Habbani, A. Ait Haddou, I. Achary, Z. Amor, M. Taky, A. Alami, A. Boughriba, M. Hafsi, A. Elmidaoui, Fluoride removal from groundwater by nanofiltration, Desalination, 212 (2007) 46–53.
  33. R. Arun Bharathi, Dr. P. Ashoka Varthanan, K. Manoj Mathew, Experimental investigation of process parameters in wire electrical discharge machining by response surface methodology on IS2062 steel, Appl. Mech. Mater., 550 (2014) 53–61.
  34. N. Maghsoudy, P.A. Azar, M.S. Tehrani, S.W. Husain, K. Larijani, Biosynthesis of Ag and Fe nanoparticles using Erodium cicutarium; study, optimization, and modeling of the antibacterial properties using response surface methodology, J. Nanostruct. Chem., 9 (2019) 203–216.
  35. M. Zait, F.Z. Addar, N. Elfilali, M. Tahaikt, A. Elmidaoui, M. Taky, Analysis and optimization of operating conditions on ultrafiltration of landfill leachate using a response surface methodological approach, Desal. Water Treat., 257 (2022) 64–75.
  36. J. Prakash Maran, S. Manikandan, K. Thirugnanasambandham, C. Vigna Nivetha, R. Dinesh, Box–Behnken design based statistical modeling for ultrasound-assisted extraction of corn silk polysaccharide, Carbohydr. Polym., 92 (2013) 604–611.
  37. S. Benalla, F.Z. Addar, M. Tahaikt, A. Elmidaoui, M. Taky, Heavy metals removal by ion-exchange resin: experimentation and optimization by custom designs, Desal. Water Treat., 262 (2022) 347–358.