References

  1. European Union (EU), EU Water Framework Directive, Directive 2000/60/EC European Parliament and Council, European Union, Maastricht, The Netherlands, 2000.
  2. European Commission, Report on the Progress in Implementation of the Water Framework Directive Programmes of Measures, Commission Staff Working Document, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, 9 March 2015.
  3. European Environmental Agency, European Water Policies and Human Health—Combining Reported Environmental Information, EEA Report No 32/2016, European Environmental Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2016, ISSN 1977–8449.
  4. V. Kanakoudis, S. Tsitsifli, T. Azariadi, Overview of the River Basin Management Plans developed in Greece under the context of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC focusing on the economic analysis, Water Resour. Manage., 29 (2015) 3149–3174.
  5. C. Gutiérrez-Martín, M.M. Borrego-Marín, J. Berbel, The economic analysis of water use in the water framework directive based on the system of environmental-economic accounting for water: a case study of the Guadalquivir river basin, Water (Switzerland), 9 (2017) 180.
  6. M.M. Borrego-Marín, C. Gutiérrez-Martín, J. Berbel, Estimation of cost recovery ratio for water services based on the system of environmental-economic accounting for water, Water Resour. Manage., 30 (2016) 767.
  7. J. Berbel, J. Martin-Ortega, P.A. Mesa, Cost-effectiveness analysis of water-saving measures for the water framework directive: the case of the Guadalquivir River basin in Southern Spain, Water Resour. Manage., 25 (2011) 623–640.
  8. S.S. Pavlov, G.J. Roerink, P.J. Hellegers, V.F. Popovich, Irrigation performance assessment in Crimea, Ukraine, Water Resour. Dev., 22 (2002) 61–78.
  9. B.B. Balana, A. Vinten, B. Slee, A review on cost-effectiveness analysis of agri-environmental measures related to the EU WFD: key issues, methods, and applications, Ecol. Econ., 70 (2011) 1021–1031.
  10. J. Jacobsen, In Search of Cost-effective Measures-Danish Report on the Use of Cost Effectiveness Analysis When Implementing the EU WFD, Institute of Food and Resource Economics, Report 191, Copenhagen, 2007.
  11. G. Tsakiris, The status of the European waters in 2015: a review, Environ. Process., 2 (2015) 543–557.
  12. R. Brouwer, C. De Blois, Integrated modelling of risk and uncertainty underlying the cost and effectiveness of water quality measures, Environ. Modell. Software, 2 (2008) 922–937.
  13. D. Hering, A. Borja, J. Carstensen, L. Carvalho, M. Elliott, C.K. Feld, A.-S. Heiskanen, R.K. Johnson, J. Moe, D. Pont, A.L. Solheim, W. van de Bund, The European Water Framework Directive at the age of 10: a critical review of the achievements with recommendations for the future, Sci. Total Environ., 408 (2010) 4007–4019.
  14. D. Moran, A. McVittie, D.J. Allcroft, D.A. Elston, Quantifying public preferences for agri-environmental policy in Scotland: a comparison of methods, Ecol. Econ., 63 (2007) 42–53.
  15. J. Barreiro-Hurlé, J. Gómez-Limón, Reconsidering heterogeneity and aggregation issues in environmental valuation: a multiattribute approach, Environ. Resour. Econ., 40 (2008) 551–570.
  16. J. Martin-Ortega, J. Berbel, Using multi-criteria analysis to explore non-market monetary values of water quality changes in the context of the Water Framework Directive, Sci. Total Environ., 408 (2010) 3990–3997.
  17. J. Fodor, P. Perny, S. Orlovski, M. Roubens, In: R. Slowinski, Handbook of Fuzzy Sets and Possibility Theory, Operations Research and Statistics, Springer, Boston, 1998, pp. 69–101.
  18. J.P. Brans, P. Vincke, A preference ranking organisation method: (The PROMETHEE method for multiple criteria decisionmaking), Manage. Sci., 31 (1985) 647–656.
  19. R.K. Shukla, D. Garg, A. Agarwal, An integrated approach of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS in modeling supply chain coordination, Prod. Manuf. Res., 2 (2014) 415–437.
  20. C.C. Sun, A performance evaluation model by integrating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods, Expert Syst. Appl., 37 (2010) 7745–7754.
  21. G. Tsakiris, M. Spiliotis, Planning against long term water scarcity: a fuzzy multicriteria approach, Water Resour. Manage., 25 (2011) 1103–1129.
  22. Special Secretariat for Water, Development of the River Basin Management Plans of the River Basins of Central Macedonia Water District According to the Specifications of the WFD 2000/60/EC, Applying the Greek Law 3199/2003 and the Greek PD 51/2007, Ministry of Environment and Energy, Athens, Greece, 2014.
  23. T. Kaya, C. Kahraman, Multicriteria renewable energy planning using an integrated fuzzy VIKOR & AHP methodology: the case of Istanbul, Energy, 35 (2010) 2517–2527.
  24. B. Roy, P. Vinckle, Multicriteria analysis: survey and new directions, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 8 (1981) 207–218.
  25. M. Spiliotis, Ch. Skoulikaris, A Hybrid Multicriteria 0/1 Programming Methodology for Prioritizing the Measures of River Basin Management Plans, 3rd EWaS International Conference on “Insights on the Water-Energy-Food Nexus”, Greece, 2018, pp. 441–449.
  26. M. Cinelli, S. Coles, K. Kirwan, Analysis of the potentials of multi criteria decision analysis methods to conduct sustainability assessment, Ecol. Indic., 46 (2014) 138–148.
  27. P. Perny, B. Roy, The use of fuzzy outranking relations in preference modeling, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 49 (1992) 33–53.
  28. J. Fiigueira, V. Mousseau, B. Roy, In: J. Fiigueira, S. Greco, M. Ehrgott, Multi Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, Springer, New York, 2005, pp. 133–162.
  29. T.L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980.
  30. L. Mikhailov, P. Tsvetinov, Evaluation of services using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, Appl. Soft Comput., 5 (2004) 23–33.
  31. D.Y. Chang, Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 95 (1996) 649–655.
  32. Y.M. Wang, Y. Luo, Z.S. Hua, On the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and its applications, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 182 (2008) 735–747.
  33. Y.M. Wang, K.S. Chin, Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: a logarithmic fuzzy preference programming methodology, Int. J. Approximate Reasoning, 52 (2011) 541–553.
  34. L. Li, K.K. Lai, A fuzzy approach to the multiobjective transportation problem, Comput. Oper. Res., 27 (2000) 43–57.
  35. G. Tsakiris, M. Spiliotis, Cropping pattern planning under water supply from multiple sources, Irrig. Drain. Syst., 20 (2006) 57–68.
  36. J.B. Gurav, D.G. Regulwar, Multi objective sustainable irrigation planning with decision parameters and decision variables fuzzy in nature, Water Resour. Manage., 26 (2012) 3005–3021.
  37. P. Perny, Multicriteria filtering methods based on concordance and non-discordance principle, Ann. Oper. Res., 80 (1998) 137–165.
  38. N. Kazakis, M. Spiliotis, K. Voudouris, F.K. Plakas, B. Papadopoulos, A fuzzy multicriteria categorization of the GALDIT method to assess seawater intrusion vulnerability of coastal aquifers, Sci. Total Environ., 621 (2018) 524–534.
  39. M.E. Fontana, D.C. Morais, Using Promethee V to select alternatives so as to rehabilitate water supply network with detected leaks, Water Resour Manage., 27 (2013) 4021–4037.
  40. F. Abu-Taleb, B. Mareschal, Water resources planning in the Middle East: application of the PROMETHEE V multicriteria method, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 81 (1995) 500–511.