References

1. R.K. Gavade, Multi-criteria decision making: an overview of different selection problems and methods, Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol., 5–4 (2014) 5643–5646.
2. M. El Amine, J. Pailhes, N. Perry, Critical review of multi-criteria decision aid methods in conceptual design phases: application to the development of a solar collector structure, Procedia CIRP, 21 (2014) 497–502.
3. M.E. Banihabib, F.-S. Hashemi-Madani, A. Forghani, Comparison of compensatory and non-compensatory multi criteria decision making models in water resources strategic management, Water Resour. Manage., 31 (2017) 3745–3759.
4. C.-L. Hwang, K.S. Yoon, Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications A State-of-the-Art Survey, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, 1981.
5. B. Srdjevic, Y.D.P. Medeiros, A.S. Faria, An objective multicriteria evaluation of water management scenarios, Water Resour. Manage., 18 (2004) 35–54.
6. T.L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation (Decision Making Series), McGraw-Hill, NY, 1980.
7. M.E. Banihabib, F. Hashemi, M.H. Shabestari, A framework for sustainable strategic planning of water demand and supply in arid regions, Sustainable Dev., 25 (2017) 254–266.
8. L. Mikhailov, A fuzzy approach to deriving priorities from interval pairwise comparison judgements, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 159 (2004) 687–704.
9. B. Srdjevic, Y.D.P. Medeiros, Fuzzy AHP assessment of water management plans, Water Resour. Manage., 22 (2008) 877–894.
10. G. Tsakiris, M. Spiliotis, Planning against long term water scarcity: a fuzzy multicriteria approach, Water Resour. Manage., 25 (2011) 1103–1129.
11. X.-L. Yang, J.-H. Ding, H. Hou, Application of a triangular fuzzy AHP approach for flood risk evaluation and response measures analysis, Nat. Hazards, 68 (2013) 657–674.
12. A. Mardani, A. Jusoh, K. MD Nor, Z. Khalifah, N. Zakwan, A. Valipour, Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications – a review of the literature from 2000 to 2014, Econ. Res. – Ekonomska Istraživanja, 28 (2015) 516–571.
13. I.B. Huang, J. Keisler, I. Linkov, Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: ten years of applications and trends, Sci. Total Environ., 409 (2011) 3578–3594.
14. F. Abid, S. Bahloul, Selected MENA countries’ attractiveness to G7 investors, Econ. Modell., 28 (2011) 2197–2207.
15. A. Papadopoulos, A. Karagiannidis, Application of the multicriteria analysis method Electre III for the optimisation of decentralised energy systems, Omega, 36 (2008) 766–776.
16. M. Hasanzadeh, A. Danehkar, M. Azizi, The application of analytical network process to environmental prioritizing criteria for coastal oil jetties site selection in Persian Gulf coasts (Iran), Ocean Coastal Manage., 73 (2013) 136–144.
17. Y.H. Lin, H.-P. Cheng, M.-L. Tseng, J.C.C. Tsai, Using QFD and ANP to analyze the environmental production requirements in linguistic preferences, Expert Syst. Appl., 37 (2010) 2186–2196.
18. M. Sambasivan, N.Y. Fei, Evaluation of critical success factors of implementation of ISO 14001 using analytic hierarchy process (AHP): a case study from Malaysia, J. Cleaner Prod., 16 (2008) 1424–1433.
19. X. Ying, G.-M. Zeng, G.-Q. Chen, L. Tang, K.-L. Wang, D.-Y. Huang, Combining AHP with GIS in synthetic evaluation of eco-environment quality—a case study of Hunan Province, China, Ecol. Modell., 209 (2007) 97–109.
20. J. Stankevičienė, T. Sviderskė, A. Miečinskienė, Dependence of sustainability on country risk indicators in EU Baltic Sea region countries, J. Bus. Econ. Manage., 15 (2014) 646–663.
21. A.C. Brent, D.E.C. Rogers, T.S.M. Ramabitsa-Siimane, M.B. Rohwer, Application of the analytical hierarchy process to establish health care waste management systems that minimise infection risks in developing countries, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 181 (2007) 403–424.
22. K. Bunruamkaew, Y. Murayam, Site suitability evaluation for ecotourism using GIS & AHP: a case study of Surat Thani Province, Thailand, Procedia – Social Behav. Sci., 21 (2011) 269–278.
23. J.Z. Ren, A. Manzardo, S. Toniolo, A. Scipioni, Sustainability of hydrogen supply chain. Part II: prioritizing and classifying the sustainability of hydrogen supply chains based on the combination of extension theory and AHP, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 38 (2013) 13845–13855.
24. T. Stypka, A. Flaga-Maryańczyk, J. Schnotale, Application of the AHP Method in Environmental Engineering: Three Case Studies, Chapter 4, F. De Felice, A. Petrillo, T. Saaty, Eds., Applications and Theory of Analytic Hierarchy Process: Decision Making for Strategic Decisions, InTech, Croatia, 2016, Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/63990.
25. K.P. Anagnostopoulos, M. Gratziou, A.P. Vavatsikos, Using the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process for selecting wastewater facilities at prefecture level, Eur. Water, 19/20 (2007) 15–24.
26. A.R. Karimi, N. Mehrdadi, S.J. Hashemian, Gh.R. Nabi- Bidhendi, R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, Using of the fuzzy topsis and fuzzy AHP methods for wastewater treatment process selection, Int. J. Acad. Res., 3 (2011) 737–745.
27. J. Curiel-Esparza, M.A. Cuenca-Ruiz, M. Martin-Utrillas, J. Canto-Perello, Selecting a sustainable disinfection technique for wastewater reuse projects, Water, 6 (2014) 2732–2747.
28. P. Roy, A. Saha, Metabolism and toxicity of arsenic: a human carcinogen, Curr. Sci., 82 (2002) 38–45.
29. V.K. Saxena, S. Kumar, V.S. Singh, Occurrence, behaviour and speciation of arsenic in groundwater, Curr. Sci., 86 (2004) 281–284.
30. D.N. Guha Mazumder, Chronic arsenic toxicity & human health, Indian J. Med. Res., 128 (2008) 436–447.
31. A. Baba, G. Tayfur, Groundwater contamination and its effect on health in Turkey, Environ. Monit. Assess., 183 (2011) 77–94.
32. U. Gemici, G. Tarcan, C. Helvacı, A.M. Somay, High arsenic and boron concentrations in groundwaters related to mining activity in the Bigadiç borate deposits (Western Turkey), Appl. Geochem., 23 (2008) 2462–2476.
33. J. Bundschuh, J.P. Maity, B. Nath, A. Baba, O. Gunduz, T.R. Kulp, J.-S. Jean, S. Kar, H.-J. Yang, Y.-J. Tseng, P. Bhattacharya, C.-Y. Chen, Naturally occurring arsenic in terrestrial geothermal systems of western Anatolia, Turkey: potential role in contamination of freshwater resources, J. Hazard. Mater., 262 (2013) 951–959.
34. A. Çavus, A.A. Atıcı, F. Şen, Investigation of water quality criteria of drinking waters in center of Van, Turkey, YYU J. Agric. Sci., 27 (2017) 326–336, (In Turkish).
35. O. Gunduz, A. Baba, H.D. Elpit, Arsenic in Groundwater in Western Anatolia, Turkey: A Review, P. Maloszewski, S. Witczak, G. Malina, Eds., Groundwater Quality Sustainability, Extended Abstract Book, Krakow, 2010, pp. 183–191.
36. A. Baba, O. Gunduz, Effect of alteration zones on water quality: a case study from Biga Peninsula, Turkey, Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 58 (2010) 499–513.
37. O. Gunduz, C. Simsek, A. Hasozbek, Arsenic pollution in the groundwater of Simav Plain, Turkey: its impact on water quality and human health, Water Air Soil Pollut., 205 (2010) 43–62.
38. S. Arikan, D. Dolgen, M.N. Alpaslan, Arsenic removal from aqueous solutions using ironoxide coating sepiolite, Fresenius Environ. Bull., 26 (2017) 7634–7642.
39. T.L. Saaty, Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World, 3rd ed., RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, 2012
40. E. Triantaphyllou, S.H. Mann, Using the analytic hierarchy process for decision making in engineering applications: some challenges, Int. J. Ind. Eng. Theory Appl. Pract., 2 (1995) 35–44.
41. E. Mu, M. Pereyra-Rojas, Understanding the Analytic Hierarchy Process, E. Mu, M. Pereyra-Rojas, Eds., Practical Decision Making: An Introduction to the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Using Super Decisions V2, Springer Briefs in Operations Research, Chapter 3, 2017, pp. 23–42.
42. N.R. Nicomel, K. Leus, K. Folens, P. Van Der Voort, G. Du Laing, Technologies for arsenic removal from water: current status and future perspectives, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 13 (2016) 62.
43. M. Vaclavikova, G.P. Gallios, S. Hredzak, S. Jakabsky, Removal of arsenic from water streams: an overview of available techniques, Clean Technol. Environ. Policy, 10 (2008) 89–95.
44. R. Johnston, H. Heijnen, Safe Water Technology for Arsenic Removal, Available at: http://archive.unu.edu/env/Arsenic/Han.pdf.
45. R.C. Cheng, S. Liang, H.-C. Wang, M.D. Beuhler, Enhanced coagulation for arsenic removal, J. AWWA., 86 (1994) 79–90.
46. USEPA Engineering Forum Issue Paper, Proven Alternatives for Aboveground Treatment of Arsenic in Groundwater, EPA- 542-S-02-002, 2002.
47. L. Wang, W. Condit, A.S.C. Chen, Technology Selection and System Design: U.S. EPA Arsenic Removal Technology Demonstration Program Round 1, EPA/600/R-05/001, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH, 2004.
48. T. Uddin, S.I. Mozumder, A. Figoli, A. Islam, E. Drioli, Arsenic removal by conventional and membrane technology: an overview, Indian J. Chem. Technol., 14 (2007) 441–450.
49. N.G. Kuan-Seong, Z. Ujang, P. Le-Clech, Arsenic removal technologies for drinking water treatment, Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol., 3 (2004) 43–53.
50. USEPA, Arsenic Treatment Technology Evaluation Handbook for Small System, Office of Water (4606M), EPA 816-R-03-014, 2003. Available at: www.epa.gov/safewater.
51. D. Mohan, C.U. Pittman Jr., Arsenic removal from water/ wastewater using adsorbents—a critical review, J. Hazard. Mater., 142 (2007) 1–53.
52. S. Arıkan, D. Dolgen, M.N. Alpaslan, Characteristics and Adsorption Capacities of Low-Cost Natural Adsorbents for Arsenic Removal, In: Proc. Book of the 2nd IWA Regional Symposium on Water, Wastewater and Environment, The Past, Present and Future of the World’s Water Resources, Cesme, Izmir, Turkey, 2017.
53. A.S.C. Chen, L. Wang, J. Oxenham, W. Condit, Capital Costs of Arsenic Removal Technologies: U.S. EPA Arsenic Removal Technology Demonstration Program Round 1, EPA/600/R-04/201, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH, 2004.
54. L. Wang, A.S.C. Chen, Costs of Arsenic Removal Technologies for Small Water Systems, U.S. EPA Arsenic Removal Technology Demonstration Program, EPA/600/R-11/090, 2011.