References

  1. A. Chapman, Application of web technology to enhance water system operations, Water Sci. Technol. Water Supply, 3 (2003) 287–294.
  2. L. Yang, M. Li, W. Li, Y. Jiang, Z. Qiang, Bench- and pilot-scale studies on the removal of pesticides from water by VUV/UV process, Chem. Eng. J., 342 (2018) 155–162.
  3. C.D. Venzke, A. Giacobbo, J.Z. Ferreira, A.M. Bernardes, M.A.S. Rodrigues, Increasing water recovery rate of membrane hybrid process on the petrochemical wastewater treatment, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 117 (2018) 152–158.
  4. J.C. Crittenden, R.R. Trussell, D.W. Hand, K.J. Howe, G. Tchobanoglous, Water Treatment: Principles and Design, 2nd ed., John Wiley and Sons, 2005.
  5. M.H. Al-Malack, W.K. Al-Nowaiser, Treatment of synthetic hypersaline produced water employing electrocoagulationmembrane bioreactor (EC-MBR) process and halophilic bacteria, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 6 (2018) 2442–2453.
  6. E. Zanacic, J. Stavrinides, D.W. McMartin, Field-analysis of potable water quality and ozone efficiency in ozone-assisted biological filtration systems for surface water treatment, Water Res., 104 (2016) 397–407.
  7. A. Spiliotopoulou, P. Rojas-Tirado, R.K. Chhetri, K.M.S. Kaarsholm, R. Martin, P.B. Pedersen, L.-F. Pedersen, H.R. Andersen, Ozonation control and effects of ozone on water quality in recirculating aquaculture systems, Water Res., 133 (2018) 289–298.
  8. H. Lin, W. Gao, F. Meng, B.-Q. Liao, K.-T. Leung, L. Zhao, J. Chen, H. Hong, Membrane bioreactors for industrial wastewater treatment: a critical review, Crit. Rev. Env. Sci. Technol., 42 (2012) 677–740.
  9. Water Environment Federation, Membrane Bioreactors: Water Environment Federation (WEF) Manual of Practice No. 36, McGraw-Hill; New York, NY, 2011.
  10. G. Pearce, SWRO pre-treatment: treated water quality, Filtr. Sep., 46 (2009) 30–33.
  11. J.P. Brans, Ph. Vincke, B. Mareschal, How to select and how to rank projects: the PROMETHEE method, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 24 (1986) 228–238.
  12. J.P. Brans, Ph. Vincke, Note—a preference ranking organisation method, Manage. Sci., 31 (1985) 647–656.
  13. J.-P. Brans, B. Mareschal, The PROMETHEE VI procedure: how to differentiate hard from soft multicriteria problems, J. Decis. Syst., 4 (1995) 213–223.
  14. D.U. Ozsahin, B. Uzun, M.S. Musa, A. Helwan, C.N. Wilson, F.V. Nurçin, N. Şentürk, I. Ozsahin, Evaluating cancer treatment alternatives using fuzzy PROMETHEE method, Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., 8 (2017) 177–185.
  15. D.U. Ozsahin, I. Ozsahin, A fuzzy PROMETHEE approach for breast cancer treatment techniques, Int. J. Med. Res. Health Sci., 7 (2018) 29–32.
  16. D.U. Ozsahin, N.A. Isa, B. Uzun, I. Ozsahin, Effective Analysis of Image Reconstruction Algorithms in Nuclear Medicine Using Fuzzy Promethee, 2018 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET), IEEE, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 2018.
  17. D.U. Ozsahin, B. Uzun, M.S. Musa, N. Şentürk, F.V. Nurçin, I. Ozsahin, Evaluating nuclear medicine imaging devices using fuzzy PROMETHEE method, Procedia Comput. Sci., 120 (2017) 699–705.
  18. D.U. Ozsahin, B. Uzun, M.S. Musa, I. Ozsahin, Evaluating X-ray based medical imaging devices with fuzzy preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluations, Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., 9 (2018) 7–10.
  19. M.T. Mubarak, I. Ozsahin, D.U. Ozsahin, Evaluation of Sterilization Methods for Medical Devices, 2019 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET), IEEE, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 2019.
  20. C. Macharis, J. Springael, K. De Brucker, A. Verbeke, PROMETHEE and AHP: the design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis.: strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 153 (2004) 307–317.