References

  1. L. Seghezzo, G. Geeman, J.B. Van Lier, H.V.M. Hamelers, G. Letinga, A review: the anaerobic treatment of sewage in UASB and EGSB reactors, Bioresour. Technol., 65 (1998) 175–190.
  2. M.V. Sperling, V.H. Freire, C.A.D. Chernicharo, Performance evaluation of an UASB-activated sludge system treating municipal wastewater, Water Sci. Technol., 43 (2001) 323–328.
  3. B. Mrowiec, J. Suschka, Anaerobic Wastewater Treatment Process, E. Plaza, E. Lewin, Eds., Research and Application of New Technologies in Wastewater Treatment and Municipal Solid Waste Disposal in Ukraine, Sweden, and Poland, Stockholm, Sweden, 2010, pp. 177–184.
  4. S. Chong, T.K. Sen, A. Kayaalp, H.M. Ang, The performance enhancements of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors for domestic sludge treatment-a state of the art review, Water Res., 46 (2012) 3434–3470.
  5. A. Tilche, S.M. Vieira, Domestic report on reactor design of anaerobic filters and sludge bed reactors, Water Sci. Technol., 24 (1991) 193–206.
  6. B. Mownica, B. Manimekalai, Performance evaluation of fluidized bed biofilm reactor using Kaldnes K1 for domestic wastewater, Int. J. Sci. Res. Dev., 5 (2017) 617–623.
  7. S.C. Oliveira, M. von Sperling, Performance evaluation of UASB reactor systems with and without post-treatment, Water Sci. Technol., 59 (2009) 1299–1306.
  8. A.A. Khan, R.Z. Gaur, V.K. Tyagi, A. Khursheed, B. Lew, I. Mehrotra, A.A. Kazmi, Sustainable options for post treatment of UASB effluent treating sewage: a review, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 55 (2011) 1232–1251.
  9. T. Bressani-Ribeiro, P.G.S. Almeida, E. Volcke, C.A.D.L. Chernicharo, Trickling filters following anaerobic sewage treatment: state of the art and perspectives, Environ. Sci.: Water Res. Technol., 4 (2018) 1721.
  10. A. Elawwad, M. Hazem, Minimization of sludge production in an integrated UASB–continuous flow sequencing batch reactor system, Desal. Wat. Treat., 91 (2017) 206–213.
  11. M. Ji, J. Yu, H. Chen, P.L. Yue, Removal of slowly biodegradable COD in combined thermophilic UASB and MBBR systems, Environ. Technol., 22 (2001) 1069–1079.
  12. S. Luostarinen, J. Rintala, Anaerobic on-site black water and kitchen waste treatment using UASB-septic tanks at low temperatures, Water Sci. Technol., 54 (2006) 143–149.
  13. A. Tawfik, F. El-Gohary, H. Temmink, Treatment of domestic wastewater in an up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor followed by moving bed biofilm reactor, Bioprocess. Biosyst. Eng., 33 (2010) 267–276.
  14. C. Moragaspitiya, J. Rajapakse, W. Senadeera, I. Ali, Simulation of dynamic behavior of a biological wastewater treatment plant in South East Queensland, Australia using Bio-Win Software, Eng. J., 21 (2016) 0125–8281.
  15. C. Khattiyavong, H.S. Lee, Performance simulation and assessment of an appropriate wastewater treatment technology in a densely populated growing city in a developing country: a case study in Vientiane, Laos, Water, 11 (2019) 1012.
  16. M. McGehee, J. Gellner, J. Beck, C. White, T. Bruton, D. Howard, BioWin Modeling of a Three Reactor IFAS System, in: Proc. Water Environment Federation 82nd Annual Technical Exhibition & Conference, Orlando, FL, USA, 2009.
  17. H. Rupp, G. Roy, B. Tautic, J. Bushey, Pilot Study Confirms Design of IFAS System for Nitrogen Reduction in Connecticut, Water Environment Federation Specialized Conference on Nutrient Removal, Washington, D.C., 2009.
  18. V. Ravi Sankar, S. Chandran, D. Pradeep Pandiyan, Performance assessment, kinetics and modelling of biofilm membrane bioreactor for the treatment of dairy wastewater, J. Environ. Biol., 39 (2018) 565–574.
  19. V. Katic, Improving the Design of a Full Scale Wastewater Treatment Plant with the Use of the Complex Activated Sludge Model, Master Thesis, Politecnico di Milano, Como Campus M.Sc. in Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, 2016.
  20. A. Elawwad, Optimized biological nitrogen removal of highstrength ammonium wastewater by activated sludge modelling, J. Water Reuse Desal., 8 (2018) 393–403.
  21. The BioWin Advantage Volume 2 Number 2: April 2011 Simulating Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket Reactors, Available at: https://www.envirosim.com/bwa/bwa22.pdf.
  22. J.J. Hulsbeek, J. Kruit, P. Roeleveld, M. van Loosdrecht, A practical protocol for dynamic modelling of activated sludge systems, Water Sci. Technol., 45 (2002) 127–136.
  23. A. Abdo, N. Nagy, A. Nagieb, I. Hendy, Calibration and Identification of Activated Sludge Model No 1 (ASM1) for Modeling and Simulation of Egyptian Wastewater Treatment Plants, Ph.D. Thesis, Zagazig University, 2017.
  24. E. Liwarska-Bizukojc, R. Biernacki, Identification of the most sensitive parameters in the activated sludge model implemented in BioWin software, Bioresour. Technol., 101 (2010) 7278–7285.
  25. APHA, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 21st ed., American Public Health Association/ American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation, Washington, D.C., 2005.
  26. E. Liwarska -Bizukojc, D. Olejnik, R. Biernacki, S. Ledakowicz, Calibration of a complex activated sludge model for the fullscale wastewater treatment plant, Bioprocess. Biosyst. Eng., 34 (2011) 659–670.
  27. J. Jafari, A. Mesdaghinia, R. Nabizadeh, M. Farrokhi, A.H. Mahv, Investigation of Anaerobic Fluidized Bed Reactor/Aerobic Moving Bed Bio Reactor (AFBR/MMBR) System for Treatment of Currant Wastewater, Iran. J. Public Health, 42 (2013) 860–867.
  28. I. Machdar, Y. Sekiguchi, H. Sumino, A. Ohashi, H. Harada, Combination of a UASB reactor and a curtain type DHS (down flow hanging sponge) reactor as a cost-effective sewage treatment system for developing countries, Water Sci. Technol., 42 (2000) 83–88.
  29. Y.S. Cao, C.M. Ang, Coupled UASB-activated sludge process for COD and nitrogen removals in municipal sewage treatment in warm climate, Water Sci. Technol., 60 (2009) 2829–2839.
  30. P.G.S. de Almeida, C. Chernicharo, C.L. Souza, Development of compact UASB/trickling filter systems for treating domestic wastewater in small communities in Brazil, Water Sci. Technol., 59 (2009) 1431–1439.
  31. E.J. La Motta, H. Padron, E. Silva, J. Luque, A. Bustillos, P. Corzo, Pilot plant comparison between the AFBR and the UASB reactor for municipal wastewater pretreatment, J. Environ. Eng., 134 (2008) 265–272.
  32. M. Perez, L. Romero, D. Sales, Comparative performance of high rate anaerobic thermophilic technologies treating industrial wastewater, Water Res., 32 (1998) 559–564.
  33. B. Lew, S. Tarre, M. Beliavski, M. Green, UASB reactor for domestic wastewater treatment at low temperatures: a comparison between a classical UASB and hybrid UASB-filter reactor, Water Sci. Technol., 49 (2004) 295–301.
  34. A. Eldyasti, M. Andalib, H. Hafez, G. Nakhla, Z.J. Comparative, Modeling of biological nutrient modeling from landfill leachate using a circulating fluidized bed bioreactor (CHYBRID UASB), J. Hazard. Mater., 187 (2011) 140–149.
  35. H. Sumino, M. Takahashi, T. Yamaguchi, K. Abe, N. Araki, S. Yamazaki, S. Shimozaki, A. Nagano, N. Nishio, Feasibility study of a pilot-scale sewage treatment system combining an up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) and an aerated fixed bed (AFB) reactor at ambient temperature, Bioresour. Technol., 98 (2007) 177–182.
  36. I. Hendy, D. El Monayeri, S. Al Mokadem, A. Nagieb, Modeling of Biofilm-ASP, Ph.D. Thesis, Zagazig University, 2013.
  37. R. Goncalves, V. Araujo, V.S. Bof, Combining up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactors and submerged aerated biofilters for secondary domestic wastewater treatment, Water Sci. Technol., 40 (1999) 71–79.
  38. R. Keller Passamani, R.F. Franca, F. Passamani, L. Vaz, S.T. Cassini, Pathogen removal efficiency from UASB + BF effluent using conventional and UV post-treatment systems, Water Sci. Technol., 50 (2004) 1–6.
  39. A. Moawad, U.F. Mahmoud, M.A. El-Khateeb, E. El-Molla, Coupling of sequencing batch reactor and UASB reactor for domestic wastewater treatment, Desalination, 242 (2009) 325–335.
  40. S. Wijeyekoon, T. Mino, H. Satoh, T. Matsuo, Effects of substrate loadings rate on biofilm structure, Water Res., 38 (2004) 2479–2488.
  41. M.F. Knutsen, Robustness of Nitrifying Biofilter Functionality: Role of Competition Between Heterotrophic and Nitrifying Bacteria on Ammonium Removal Efficiency and Microbial Community Structure, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2017.
  42. E. Foresti, M. Zaiat, M. Vallero, Anaerobic processes as the core technology for sustainable domestic wastewater treatment: consolidated applications, new trends, perspectives, and challenges, Rev. Environ. Sci. BioTechnol., 5 (2006) 3–19.