References

  1. IPCC, Working Group I Technical Support Unit, An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5°C Above Pre-Industrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways, in the Context of Strengthening the Global Response to the Threat of Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, Switzerland, 2018.
  2. J.C. Doelman, E. Stehfest, A. Tabeau, H. van Meijl, Making the Paris agreement climate targets consistent with food security objectives, Global Food Secur., 23 (2019) 93–103.
  3. G.M. Locosselli, E.P. de Camargo, T.C.L. Moreira, E. Todesco, M. de Fátima Andrade, C.D.S. de André, P.A. de André, J.M. Singer, L.S. Ferreira, P.H.N. Saldiva, M.S. Buckeridge, The role of air pollution and climate on the growth of urban trees, Sci. Total Environ., 666 (2019) 652–661.
  4. L. Onofri, F. Bianchin, V. Boatto, How to assess future agricultural performance under climate change? A case-study on the Veneto region, Agric. Food Econ., 7 (2019) 16.
  5. J.F.T. de Souza, S.A Pacca, How far can low-carbon energy scenarios reach based on proven technologies?, Mitigation Adapt. Strategies Global Change, 24 (2019) 687–705.
  6. C. de Guttry, D. Süsser, M. Döring, Situating climate change: psychological distances as tool to understand the multifaceted dimensions of climate change meanings, Geoforum, 104 (2019) 92–100.
  7. M. Wang, C. Feng, Impacts of oriented technologies and economic factors on China’s industrial climate mitigation, J. Cleaner Prod., 233 (2019) 1016–1028.
  8. G. Bachner, J. Mayer, K.W. Steininger, Costs or benefits? Assessing the economy-wide effects of the electricity sector’s low carbon transition – the role of capital costs, divergent risk perceptions and premiums, Energy Strategy Rev., 26 (2019) 100373.
  9. IEA, World Energy Outlook 2016, International Energy Agency, Paris.
  10. E.S. Spang, W.R. Moomaw, K.S. Gallagher, P.H. Kirshen, D.H. Marks, The water consumption of energy production: an international comparison, Environ. Res. Lett., 9 (2014) 105002.
  11. C.P. Tan, Q. Zhi, The energy-water nexus: a literature review of the dependence of energy on water, Energy Procedia, 88 (2016) 277–284.
  12. J.L. Peña, R. Rodríguez, Are EU’s climate and energy package 20-20-20 targets achievable and compatible? Evidence from the impact of renewables on electricity prices, Energy, 183 (2019) 477–486.
  13. P. Tsafack, D. Ngwashi, B. Ducharne, E. Tanyi, Greenness percentage of the said green renewable energy: a case study, Energy Rep., 5 (2019) 979–986.
  14. A. Rahil, R. Gammon, N. Brown, J. Udie, M.U. Mazhar, Potential economic benefits of carbon dioxide (CO2) reduction due to renewable energy and electrolytic hydrogen fuel deployment under current and long term forecasting of the social carbon cost (SCC), Energy Rep., 5 (2019) 602–618.
  15. Y.L. Liu, M. Hejazi, P. Kyle, S.H. Kim, E. Davies, D.G. Miralles, A.J. Teuling, Y.J. He, D. Niyogi, Global and regional evaluation of energy for water, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50 (2016) 9736–9745.
  16. P.T. Vo, H.H. Ngo, W. Guo, J.L. Zhou, P.D. Nguyen, A. Listowski, X.C. Wang, A mini-review on the impacts of climate change on wastewater reclamation and reuse, Sci. Total Environ., 494 (2014) 9–17.
  17. J. Bosque-Maurel, J. Vilá-Valentí, Geography of Spain, Planeta Publishing House, Barcelona, 1990.
  18. M. de Terán, L.S. Sabaris, Regional Geography of Spain, Ariel Publishing House, Barcelona, 1987.
  19. G. Morales-Matos, The Canary Islands, an isolated region?, Assoc. Spanish Geogr. Bull., 32 (2001) 155–175.
  20. Articles 349 and 355 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), The Outermost Regions, Technical Sheets on the European Union, Estrasburgo, France, 2016.
  21. Great Virtual Encyclopedia of the Canary Islands: Nature and Culture, GEVIC Project, Rincon Association for the Study of Social Creativity, Canary Islands, Spain, Available at: http:// www.gevic.net/, access date: 02/02/2015.
  22. Canary Islands Institute of Statistics, Indicators for Years on Water Supply and Treatment in Canary Islands, Total Volume of Water Controlled and Distributed to Users, Las Palmas, 2013.
  23. J.J. Braojos, I. Farrujia, J.D. Fernandez, Tenerife Water Resources to Climate Change, Island Council of Aguas de Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain, 2006.
  24. United Nations, Water for a Sustainable World. Report on Water Resources in the World, Italy, 2015.
  25. J.M. Veza, Desalination in the Canary Islands: an update, Desalination, 133 (2001) 259–270.
  26. Government of the Canary Islands, Canary Islands Energy Plan, Ministry of Industry, Commerce and New Technologies, Canary Islands, Spain, 2007.
  27. J.R. Stokes, A. Horvath, Energy and air emission effects of water supply, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43 (2009) 2680–2687.
  28. Y.F. Gu, Y.-N. Dong, H.T. Wang, A. Keller, J. Xu, T. Chiramba, F.T. Li, Quantification of the water, energy and carbon footprints of wastewater treatment plants in China considering a water– energy nexus perspective, Ecol. Indic., 60 (2016) 402–409.
  29. N. Sununta, R. Kongboon, S. Sampattagul, GHG evaluation and mitigation planning for low carbon city case study: Dan Sai Municipality, J. Cleaner Prod., 228 (2019) 1345–1353.
  30. Directive 91/271/EC of the European Economic Community Council, May 21, 1991.
  31. Spanish Association of Supply and Sanitation Public Operators, Wastewater Treatment Report in Spain, South Blue Tide, Spain, 2013.
  32. K. Aikens, M. McKenzie, P. Vaughter, Environmental and sustainability education policy research: a systematic review of methodological and thematic trends, Environ. Educ. Res., 22 (2016) 333–359.
  33. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment of the Government of Spain, Roadmap of Fuzzy Sectors A-2020, Executive Summary, 2014.
  34. European Commission, Europe 2020: A Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth, Working Paper, Brussels, 2010.
  35. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Working Group III, Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report, Mitigation of Climate Change, New York, 2014.
  36. J. Bylka, T. Mroz, A review of energy assessment methodology for water supply systems, Energies, 12 (2019) 4599.
  37. California Air Resource Board, Local Government Operations Protocol: For the Quantification and Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventories, United States, 2010.
  38. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Greenhouse Gas Emissions Estimation Methodologies for Biogenic Emissions from Selected Source Categories: Solid Waste Disposal Wastewater Treatment Ethanol Fermentation, United States, 2010.
  39. O.K. Nielsen, M.S. Plejdrup, M. Winther, M. Nielsen, S. Gyldenkærne, M.H. Mikkelsen, R. Albrektsen, M. Thomsen, K.H. Hjelgaard, H. Katja, P. Fauser, H.G. Bruun, V.K. Johannsen, T. Nord-Larsen, L. Vesterdal, I. Callesen, O.H. Caspersen, N.S. Bentsen, E. Rasmussen, S.B. Petersen, T.M. Olsen, M.G. Hansen, Denmark’s National Inventory Report 2019: Emission Inventories 1990–2017-Submitted Under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol, Denmark, 2019.
  40. S. Eggleston, L. Buendia, K. Miwa, T. Ngara, K. Tanabe, IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Japan, 2006.
  41. K. Pagilla, A Systematic Approach to Establishing Carbon Footprints for Wastewater Treatment Plants, Water Environment Federation, Alexandria, Washington DC, U.S., 2009.
  42. C. Hill, Discussion Paper for a Wastewater Treatment Plant Sector Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reporting Protocol, Prepared for the California Wastewater Climate Change Group and the Bay Area Clean Water Agencies, Oakland, 2007.
  43. G. Mannina, G. Ekama, D. Caniani, A. Cosenza, G. Esposito, R. Gori, M. Garrido-Baserba, D. Rosso, G. Olsson, Greenhouse gases from wastewater treatment — a review of modelling tools, Sci. Total Environ., 551–552 (2016) 254–270.
  44. M. Molinos-Senante, F. Hernández-Sancho, R. Sala-Garrido, G. Cirelli, Economic feasibility study for intensive and extensive wastewater treatment considering greenhouse gases emissions, J. Environ. Manage., 123 (2013) 98–104.
  45. Ministry of Industry, Energy and Tourism of Spain, Royal Decree 738/2015, of 31 July, by Which the Activity of Electricity Production and Clearance Process in Electrical Systems of Nonpeninsular Territories is Regulated, Spain, 2015.
  46. T. Janse, P. Wiers, The climate footprint: a practical tool to address climate change, Water Sci. Technol., 56 (2007) 157–163.
  47. Spanish Institute for the Diversification and Energy Saving, CO2 Emission Factors and Coefficients Step by Primary Energy from Different Sources Final Energy, Spain, 2014.
  48. C. Remy, B. Lesjean, J. Waschnewski, Identifying energy and carbon footprint optimization potentials of a sludge treatment line with life cycle assessment, Water Sci. Technol., 67 (2013) 63–73.
  49. Catalonia Generalitat Office, Interdepartmental Commission on Climate Change, Practical Guide for the Calculation of Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions, Spain, 2015.
  50. Metropolitan Water Supply and Sanitation Company of Seville, Inventory of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Urban Water Cycle, Spain, 2014.
  51. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Vol. 5 – Waste, Chapter 6 – Wastewater Treatment and Discharge, Switzerland, 2006.
  52. Canary Islands Government, Ministry of Infrastructure, Transport and Housing General Water Directorate, Groundwater Control Program, Water Framework Directive, Canary Islands, Spain, 2006.
  53. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Vol. 5 – Waste, Chapter 2 – Waste Generation, Composition and Management Data, Switzerland, 2006.
  54. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Volume 4: Agriculture, forestry and other land use. Chapter 11. N2O emissions from managed soils, and CO2 emissions from lime and urea application, 2006.
  55. J.R.M Rodríguez, M.A.S. Turégano, Competitiveness and quality in the sun and beach tourist destinations. The case of the Canary Islands, Cuadernos de turismo, 22 (2008) 123–143.
  56. Ministry of Public Works, Housing and Water of the Island Council of La Palma, Decree 166/2001, of July 30, Which Approves the Insular Hydrological Plan of La Palma., 2001.
  57. Ministry of Public Works, Housing and Water of the Island Council of La Gomera, Decree 101/2002, of July 26, Which Approves the Insular Hydrological Plan of La Gomera, 2002.
  58. G.-J. Gerbrandy, The EP Calls for the Gradual Elimination of Landfills and the Incineration of Recyclable Materials, Initiative Report of the European Parliament, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium. Available at: http://www.europarl.europa. eu/, access date: 04/10/15.
  59. R. Calero, J.A. Carta, Action plan for wind energy development in the Canary Islands, Energy Policy, 32 (2004) 1185–1197.
  60. M. Hu, L. Gao, Z.H. Chen, C.F. Ma, Y. Zhou, J. Chen, S. Ma, M. Laghari, B. Xiao, B.P. Zhang, D. Guo, Syngas production by catalytic in-situ steam co-gasification of wet sewage sludge and pine sawdust, Energy Convers. Manage., 111 (2016) 409–416.
  61. J.J. Sadhwani, B. Del Río-Gamero, Valorization of Sewage Sludge as Second Generation Products, Towards a Circular Economy, 7th International Congress on Energy and Environment Engineering and Management (CIIEM7), Canary Islands, Spain, 2017.
  62. J. Quesada, La autosuficiencia energética de los ecoparques empieza la cuenta atrás, Canarias7 Press Journal, Canarias 7 Press Journal, Canary Islands, Spain, Available at: https:// www.canarias7.es/, Access date: 11/05/2019.
  63. S.K. Teoh, L.Y. Li, Feasibility of alternative sewage sludge treatment methods from a lifecycle assessment (LCA) perspective, J. Cleaner Prod., 247 (2020) 119495.