References

  1. M. Hebbert, Engineering, urbanism and the struggle for street design, J. Urban Des., 10 (2005) 39–59.
  2. P.M. Hess, Avenues or arterials: the struggle to change street building practices in Toronto, Canada, J. Urban Des., 14 (2009) 1–28.
  3. T. Monfaredzadeh, U. Berardi, Beneath the smart city: dichotomy between sustainability and competitiveness, Int. J. Sustainable Build. Technol. Urban Dev., 6 (2015) 140–156.
  4. E. Negre, C. Rosenthal-Sabroux, M. Gascó, A Knowledge-Based Conceptual Vision of the Smart City, 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Science, IEEE, Kauai, HI, USA, 2015, pp. 2317–2325.
  5. T. Plieninger, H. Draux, N. Fagerholm, C. Bieling, C. Bürgi, M. Kizos, T. Kuemmerle, T. Primdahl, P.H. Verburg, The driving forces of landscape change in Europe: a systematic review of the evidence, Land Use Policy, 57 (2016) 204–214.
  6. M. Ibrahim, A. El-Zaart, C. Adams, Smart sustainable cities roadmap: readiness for transformation towards urban sustainability, Sustainable Cities Soc., 37 (2018) 530–540.
  7. A. Sokolov, N. Veselitskaya, V. Carabias, O. Yildirim, Scenariobased identification of key factors for smart cities development policies, Technol. Forecasting Social Change, 148 (2019) 119729, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119729.
  8. M. Grochulska-Salak, Re-urbanization in relation to eco-city sustainable development, Acta Sci. Pol. Arch., 20 (2021) 3–12.
  9. V. Lüderitz, R. Jüpner, S. Müller, C.K. Feld, Renaturalization of streams and rivers — the special importance of integrated ecological methods in measurement of success. An example from Saxony-Anhalt (Germany), Limnologica, 34 (2004) 249–263.
  10. E. Wohl, S.N. Lane, A.C. Wilcox, The science and practice of river restoration, Water Resour. Res., 51 (2015) 5974–5997.
  11. EEA, Rivers and Lakes in European Cities Past and Future Challenges, Technical Report No. 26/2016, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, 2016.
  12. European Centre for River Restoration, RiverWiki, River Restoration Centre, 2021. Available at: https://restorerivers.eu/ wiki/, accessed 24.02.2021.
  13. River Restoration Centre, National River Restoration Inventory, River Restoration Centre Website, 2021. Available at: https:// www.therrc.co.uk/, accessed 24.02.2021.
  14. European Commission, Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on ‘Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions – EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 – Bringing Nature Back Into Our Lives’ (COM(2020) 380 final), EESC 2020/00896, OJ C 429, 11.12.2020, pp. 259–267.
  15. F.S. Jamali, S. Mosler, The Role of Cultural Ecosystem Services in Urban Riverscape Restoration, Fifth International Cultural Landscape Conference, Urban Cultural Landscape: Past; Present; Future Tehran, Iran, 2021. Available at: https://www. academia.edu/9437153/The_Role_of_Cultural_Ecosystem_ Services_in_Urban_Riverscape_Restoration, accessed 10.02.2021.
  16. R. Costanza, J.H. Cumberland, H. Daly, R. Goodland, R.B. Norgaard, I. Kubiszewski, C. Franco, An Introduction to Ecological Economics, 2nd ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2014.
  17. I. Kowarik, Wild Urban Woodlands: Towards a Conceptual Framework, Wild Urban Woodlands, Berlin, Springer, Heidelberg, 2005, pp. 1–32.
  18. I. Kowarik, Novel urban ecosystems, biodiversity, and conservation, Environ. Pollut., 159 (2011) 1974–1983.
  19. I. Kowarik, Cities and wilderness, Int. J. Wilderness, 19 (2013) 32–36.
  20. S.T.A. Pickett, M.L. Cadenasso, J.M. Grove, C.H. Nilon, R.V. Pouyat, W.C. Zipperer, R. Costanza, Urban ecological systems: linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 32 (2001) 127–157.
  21. P. Bolund, S. Hunhammar, Ecosystem services in urban areas, Ecol. Econ., 29 (1999) 293–301.
  22. E. Rall, C. Bieling, S. Zytynska, S. Haase, Exploring city-wide patterns of cultural ecosystem service perceptions and use, Ecol. Indic., 77 (2017) 80–95.
  23. M. Carmona, The place-shaping continuum: a theory of urban design process, J. Urban Des., 19 (2014) 2–36.
  24. T. Plieninger, H. Draux, N. Fagerholm,, C. Bieling, M. Bürgi, T. Kizos, T. Kuemmerle, J. Primdahl, P.H. Verburg, The driving forces of landscape change in Europe: a systematic review of the evidence, Land Use Policy, 57 (2016) 204–214.
  25. A. Sokolov, N. Veselitskaya, V. Carabias, O. Yildirim, Scenariobased identification of key factors for smart cities development policies, Technol. Forecasting Social Change, 148 (2019) 119729, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119729.
  26. R. Fish, A. Church, M. Winter, Conceptualising cultural ecosystem services: a novel framework for research and critical engagement, Ecosyst. Serv., 21 (2016) 208–217.
  27. UNEP, ‘Millenium Ecosystem Asessment’, United States Environment Programme, 2005. Available at: https://www. millenniumassessment.org/en/index.html (accessed: 15.01.2021).
  28. D. Uzzell, E. Pol, D. Badenas, Place identification, social cohesion, and environmental sustainability, Environ. Behavior, 34 (2002) 26–53.
  29. J.W.R. Whitehand, P.J. Larkham, Urban Landscapes – International Perspectives, Routledge, New York, 2003.
  30. R. Koolhaas, S, M, L, XL, The Monacelli Press, Rotterdam, 2000.
  31. W. Kosiński, Human–Values–Beauty City–Architect–Composition, Techn. Transactions, Y. 111 (2-A), 2014, pp. 121–193.
  32. S.C. Addanki, H. Venkataraman, Greening the economy: a review of urban sustainability measures for developing new cities, Sustainable Cities and Soc., 32 (2017) 1–8.
  33. C. Moughtin, R. Cuesta, P. Signoretta, Ch. Sarris, Urban Design: Method and Techniques, Architectural Press, New York, +1999.
  34. N. Droste, I. Ring, R. Santos, M. Kettunen, Ecological fiscal transfers in Europe – evidence-based design options for a transnational scheme, Ecol. Econ., 147 (2018) 373–382.
  35. P. Wu, C. Mao, J. Wang, Y. Song, J. Wang, A decade review of the credits obtained by LEED v2.2 certified green building projects, Build. Environ., 102 (2016) 167–178.
  36. Urząd Miasta Łodzi, Studium Uwarunkowań i Kierunków Zagospodarowania Przestrzennego Miasta Łodzi, Uwarunkowania, 2018, Urząd Miasta Łodzi, p. 32. [Municipality of Łódź, Łódź Masterplan – Study of Conditions and Directions of Spatial Development for City of Łódź: Conditions], (in Polish).
  37. M. Hanzl, Redeveloping the City Structure–the Case of Łódź ‘New City Center’, Conference: Proceedings REAL CORP, 2011.
  38. A. Bartnik, Wieloletnie zmiany odpływu małej rzeki miejskiej pod wpływem antropopresji (na przykładzie Sokołówki – Łódź), Monografie Komitetu Gospodarki Wodnej PAN, 39 (2016) [Multiannual Changes in the Outflow of a Small City River Under the Influence of Anthropopressure (On the Example of Sokołówka – Łódź) Monographies of Water Management Committee – Polish Academy of Science] (in Polish).
  39. S. Szklarek, I. Wagner, T. Jurczak, M. Zalewski, Sequential Sedimentation-Biofiltration System for the purification of a small urban river (the Sokołówka, Łódź) supplied by stormwater, J. Environ. Manage., 205 (2018) 201–208.
  40. Y. Negussie, M. Urbaniak, S. Szklarek, K. Lont, I. Gągała, M. Zalewski, Efficiency analysis of two sequential biofiltration systems in Poland and Ethiopia – the pilot study, Ecohydrol. Hydrobiol., 12 (2012) 271–285.
  41. A. Bartnik, P. Moniewski, Operation of the settling ponds and flow-through reservoirs in urban and suburban catchment (Sokołówka and Dzierzązna catchment case), ANNALES Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska, Lublin – Polonia, 75 (2015) 83–99.
  42. Z. Tian, B. Zheng, M. Liu, Z. Zhang, Phragmites australis and Typha orientalis in removal of pollutant in Taihu Lake, China, J. Environ. Sci., 21 (2009) 440–446.
  43. Z. Wei, Q.V. Le, W. Peng, Y. Yang, H. Yang, H. Gu, S.S. Lam, C. Sonne, A review on phytoremediation of contaminants in air, water and soil, J. Hazard. Mater., 403 (2021) 123658, doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123658.
  44. L.K. Sawicki, Bobry, Przyroda Polska, nr, Liga Ochrony Przyrody, 3 (1989) 16–18, (Beavers, Polish Nature), (in Polish).
  45. S. Wrona, A. Wrona, Kwerenda interpretacyjna (historyczna), Zadanie pn., Inwentaryzacja drzew i krzewów oraz projekt odtworzenia strat w drzewostanie po nawałnicach z 2017 r. w zasobach parku im. Adama Mickiewicza w Łodzi, 2019 [Search and Interpretation (Historical Query, Enterprise “Inventory of Trees and Shrubs, as Well as a Design of Tree Stand Restoration After 2017 Squalls in Adam Mickiewicz Park, Łódź], (in Polish).
  46. F. Pardo-Bosch, A. Aguado, M. Pino, Holistic model to analyze and prioritize urban sustainable buildings for public services, Sustainable Cities Soc., 4 (2019) 227–236.
  47. K. Lynch, The Image of the City, MIT Press, Massachusetts, 1960.
  48. K. Wejchert, Elementy kompozycji urbanistycznej, Arkady, Warszawa, 1976 [Elements of Urban Composition], (in Polish).
  49. J.W.R. Whitehand, P.J. Larkham, Urban Landscapes – International Perspectives, Routledge, New York, 2003.
  50. K. Rybak-Niedziółka, Miasto jako krajobraz, KPZK PAN, CXCI, Warszawa, 2018 [City as Landscape], (in Polish).
  51. Ch. Alexander, S. Ishikawa, M. Silverstein, A Pattern Language, Oxford University Press, New York, 1977.
  52. P.J.G. Ribeiro, L.A. Pena Jardim Gonçalves, Urban resilience: a conceptual framework, Sustainable Cities Soc., 50 (2019) 101625, doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625.
  53. S.C. Addanki, H. Venkataraman, Greening the economy: a review of urban sustainability measures for developing new cities, Sustainable Cities Soc., 32 (2017) 1–8.
  54. R.W. Gastil, Z. Ryan, Eds., Open New Design for Public Space, Van Alen Institute, Project in Public Architecture, New York, 2004.
  55. E. Neufert, Architect’s Data, 5th ed., John Wiley and Sons Ltd., Hoboken, United States, 2019.
  56. E.O. Wilson, Biophilia, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2014.
  57. R. Ewing, S. Handy, Measuring the unmeasurable: urban design qualities related to walkability, J. Urban Des., 14 (2009) 65–84.
  58. I. Marotta, Flussbad Berlin Re-Naturalization Project for the Spree River in the Museum Island, Adv. Mater. Res., 1149 (2018) 76–85.
  59. M. Grochulska-Salak, Re-urbanization in relation to eco-city sustainable development, Acta Sci. Pol. Arch., 20 (2021) 3–12.
  60. Flussbad Berlin. Available at: http://www.flussbad-berlin.de/, accessed 30.01.2021.
  61. E. Canosa Zamora, Á. García Carballo, The failure of econeighborhood projects in the City of Madrid (Spain), Urban Sci., 2 (2018) 111, doi: 10.3390/urbansci2040111.
  62. G. Peña, C. Cucuzzella, Ecomannerism, Sustainability, 13 (2021) 1307, doi: 10.3390/su13031307.
  63. European Commission, Life Programme, LiRiLi – Living River Liesing – Demonstrative Ecological Reconstruction of a Heavily Modified Waterbody in an Urban Environment, LIFE02 ENV/A/000282, 2021. Available at: http://10.226.41.95:1026/life/, accessed 30.01.2021.