References

  1. C. Schlenoff, P. Denno, R. Ivester, R. Ivester, S. Szykman, Analysis and approach to using existing ontological systems for applications in manufacturing, Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf., 14 (2000) 257–270.
  2. W3 Ontology Constructor. Available at: http://www. w3.org/2001/11/IsaViz/Overview.html
  3. A. Kalyanpur, B. Parsia, E. Sirin, B. Cuenca Grau, J. Hendler, SWOOP: a web ontology editing browser, J. Web Semant., 4 (2006) 144–153.
  4. C.W. Holsapple, K.D. Joshi, A collaborative approach to ontology design, Commun. ACM, 45 (2002) 42–47.
  5. Protege Constructor. Available at: http://protege.stanford.edu
  6. Apollo Application Page. Available at: http://apollo.open.ac.uk/index.html
  7. I. Yeremeyev, A. Dychko, V. Kyselov, N. Remez, S. Kraychuk, N. Ostapchuk, Model monitoring and evaluation of radioactive contamination, Latvian J. Phys. Tech. Sci., 56 (2019) 57–67.
  8. A. Dychko, Wastewater biochemical treatment management by biotic factors effect, Compl. Sys. Des. Manage., 25 (2016) 186–191.
  9. A. Dychko, N. Remez, I. Opolinskyi, S. Kraychuk, N. Ostapchuk, L. Yevtieieva, Modelling of two-stage methane digestion with pretreatment of biomass, Latvian J. Phys. Tech. Sci., 55 (2018) 37–44.
  10. P. Amoatey, R. Bani, Wastewater Management, F.S. García Einschlag, Ed., Waste Water – Evaluation and Management, IntechOpen, 2016, doi: 10.5772/16158.
  11. N. Vidal, R. Bañares-Alcántara, I. Rodríguez-Roda, M. Poch, Design of wastewater treatment plants using a conceptual design methodology, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 41 (2002) 4993–5005.
  12. X. Flores, A. Bonmatí, M. Poch, I. Rodríguez-Roda, R. Bañares- Alcántara, Selection of the activated sludge configuration during the conceptual design of activated sludge plants using multicriteria analysis, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 44 (2005) 3556–3566.
  13. K. Ramasami, B. Velumani, M.A. Perumal, Semantic Integration of Waste Management Components – An Ontology Based Approach, National Conference on Recent Advances in Computer Science and Applications (NCRACSA – 2015), The Gandhigram Rural Institute-Deemed University, Dindugul, 2015, 231–236.
  14. A. Sinha, P. Couderc, Using OWL Ontologies for Selective Waste Sorting and Recycling, OWLED-2012, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, 2014, pp. 1–8.
  15. M.K. van Ittersum, F. Ewert, T. Heckelei, J. Wery, J. Alkan Olsson, E. Andersen, I. Bezlepkina, F. Brouwer, M. Donatelli, G. Flichman, L. Olsson, A.E. Rizzoli, T. van der Wal, J. Erik Wien, J. Wolf, Integrated assessment of agricultural systems – a component-based framework for the European Union (SEAMLESS), Agric. Syst., 96 (2008) 150–165.
  16. S.A. Zagorodnya, V.O. Okhariev, N.A. Novokhatska, M. Popova, GIS-based assessment of anthropogenic influence in Western Polissya region limnological ecosystems, Environ. Saf. Nat. Resour., 26 (2018) 23–33.
  17. M.F. Mata Rivera, R.Z. Flores, D.C. Frontana, C.G. Mendoza, A Semantic Environmental GIS for Solid Waste Management, SEMAPRO 2012 : The Sixth International Conference on Advances in Semantic Processing, Barcelona, Spain, September 23–28, 2012, pp. 97–102.
  18. M. Kultsova, R. Rudnev, A. Anikin, Z. Irina, An Ontology- Based Approach to Intelligent Support of Decision Making in Waste Management, IISA 2016 – 7th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems & Applications (IISA), Chalkidiki, Greece, 2016, pp. 2–7.
  19. M. Popova, O.Y. Stryzhak, Ontological interface as a means of presenting information resources in the GIS environment, Scientific Notes of the Taurida National University. V. I. Vernadsky, 65 (2013) 127–135.
  20. V. Velichko, M. Popova, V. Prikhodnyuk, O. Stryzhak, TODOS is an IT platform for the formation of transdisciplinary information environments, Weap. Syst. Mil. Equip., 1 (2017) 10–19.
  21. O. Ye. Strizhak, V.B. Shapovalov, Ye. B. Shapovalov, Ontologichna pidtrimka navchalnikh doslidzhen (Ontological support of educational research): Informaczijni tekhnologiyi upravlinnya ekologichnoyu bezpekoyu, prirodokoristuvannyam, zakhodami v nadzvichajnikh situaczi`yakh: rozrobki ta dosyagnennya do 100-richchya Naczionalnoyi akademiyi nauk Ukrayini, Kiev 2018, pp. 165–168.
  22. R. Volckmann, Transdisciplinarity: Basarab Nicolescu Talks with Russ Volckmann. Lan. Neur., 6 (2007) 76.
  23. B. Nicolescu, A. Ertas, Transdisciplinary Theory and Practice, ATLAS Publishing, United States of America, 2013, ISBN: 0-9778129-6-0.
  24. M. Klein, A. Bernstein, Searching for Services on the Semantic Web Using Process Ontologies, New York, 172 (2001) 1–16.
  25. V. Prychodniuk, O.Y. Stryzhak, Ontological GIS as a means of organizing geospatial information, Sci. Tech. Air Force Armed Forces Ukr., 27 (2017) 167–174.
  26. O.Y. Stryzhak, V.V. Prychodniuk, V. Podlipaiev, Model of Transdisciplinary Representation of GEOspatial Information, In: Advances in Information and Communication Technologies, Springer Nature, Switzerland, 2019, pp. 34–75.
  27. O.Y. Stryzhak, V. Gorborukov O. Franchuk, M. Popova, Ontology of the choice problem and its application in the analysis of limnological systems, Eco. Saf. Nat. Manage., 3 (2014) 172–183.
  28. Y.B. Shapovalov, S.O. Zhadan, G. Bochmann, A. Salyuk, V. Nykyforov, Dry anaerobic digestion of chicken manure: review, Appl. Sci. (Sp. Issue Ind. Appl. Anaer. Dig.), 10 (2020) 7825, doi: 10.3390/app10217825.
  29. R.J. Patinvoh, A. Kalantar Mehrjerdi, I. Sárvári Horváth, M.J. Taherzadeh, Dry fermentation of manure with straw in continuous plug flow reactor: reactor development and process stability at different loading rates, Bioresour. Technol., 224 (2017) 197–205.
  30. F.J. Callaghan, D.A.J. Wase, K. Thayanithy, C.F. Forster, Co-digestion of waste organic solids: batch studies, Bioresour. Technol., 67 (1999) 117–122.
  31. F. Abouelenien, Y. Kitamura, N. Nishio, Y. Nakashimada, Dry anaerobic ammonia-methane production from chicken manure, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 82 (2009) 757–764.
  32. G. Markou, Improved anaerobic digestion performance and biogas production from poultry litter after lowering its nitrogen content, Bioresour. Technol., 196 (2015) 726–730.
  33. F. Abouelenien, Y. Namba, N. Nishio, Y. Nakashimada, Dry co-digestion of poultry manure with agriculture wastes, Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., 178 (2016) 932–946.
  34. F. Abouelenien, N. Elsaidy, Y. Nakashimada, Simultaneous ammonia removal and methane production from chicken manure under dry thermophilic condition, J. Am. Sci., 9 (2013) 90–94.
  35. R. Rajagopal, D.I. Massé, Start-up of dry anaerobic digestion system for processing solid poultry litter using adapted liquid inoculum, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 102 (2016) 495–502.
  36. T. Böjti, K.L. Kovács, B. Kakuk, R. Wirth, G. Rákhely, Z. Bagi, Pretreatment of poultry manure for efficient biogas production as monosubstrate or co-fermentation with maize silage and corn stover, Anaerobe, 46 (2017) 138–145.
  37. A.R. Jantrania, High-Solids Anaerobic Fermentation of Poultry Manure, Ohio State University, 1985.
  38. V. Gorborukov O.Y. Stryzhak, O. Franchuk, V.B. Shapovalov, Ontological representation of the problem of ranking alternatives, Math. Mod. Econ., 4 (2018) 49–69.
  39. S.M. Rashid, D.L. McGuinness, Creating and Using an Education Standards Ontology to Improve Education, ISWC 2018 Workshop – Semantic Web for Social Good, Monterey, California, (2018).
  40. V.B. Dem’yanenko, S.P. Kal`noj, O. Ye. Strizhak, Ontological aspects of construction of the E-scenario of support of process of scientific researches of pupils of small academy of sciences of Ukraine (Ontologichni aspekti pobudovi E-sczenariyu suprovodu proczesu naukovikh doslidzhen uchniv maloyi akademiyi nauk Ukrayini). Informaczijni tekhnologiyi v osviti, 15 (2013) 242–248.
  41. A.V. Palagin, S.L. Petrenko, Ontologicheskie metody i sredstva obrabotki predmetnykh znanij: Lugansk: VNU im. V. Dalya, 2012, p. 323.
  42. S.O. Dovgy, V.Y. Velychko, L.S. Globa, O.Y. Stryzhak, Komp‚ yuterni ontologiyi ta yikh vikoristannya u navchalnomu proczesi (Computer ontologies and their use in the educational process), Teoriya i praktika MONOGRAFIYa: Kiyiv: I`nstitut obdarovanoyi ditini, 2013.
  43. L.M. Aroyo, D. Dicheva, SW-EL’ 05: Applications of Semantic Web Technologies for E-learning, AIED’05 Workshop, 2005.
  44. R.M. Rosdale, Who Needs “Blended Learning”? Some Thoughts on a Political Concept, E. Tomadaki, P. Scott, Eds., Innovative Approaches for Learning and Knowledge Sharing, EC-TEL 2006 Workshops Proceedings, ISSN 1613-0073, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 213, 2006, pp. 18–20.
  45. Y.B. Shapovalov, V.B. Shapovalov, O.Y. Stryzhak, A. Salyuk, Ontology-based systemizing of the science information devoted to waste utilizing by methanogenesis, World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol., Int. J. Comput. Electr. Autom. Contr. Inf. Eng., 12 (2018) 1009–1014.
  46. N. Kharal, Selection of Novel Technology for Wastewater Treatment, A Term Paper On Modern WWT With Novel Technology, 2017, pp. 1–23.
  47. M. Georgiopoulou, K. Abeliotis, M. Kornaros, G. Lyberatos, Selection of the best available technology for industrial wastewater treatment based on environmental evaluation of alternative treatment technologies: the case of milk industry, Fresenius Environ. Bull., 17 (2008) 111–121.
  48. Z.I. Bilyk, Y.B. Shapovalov, V.B. Shapovalov, V.B. Atamas, I.S. Chernetskiy, The Scientific, Engineering Methods and Their Integration as Part of STEM Education. The Practical Guide, Theory Pract. Sci. Educ., 2019, pp. 73–91.