References

  1. E.S. Elmolla, M. Chaudhuri, The feasibility of using combined Fenton-SBR for antibiotic wastewater treatment, Desalination, 285 (2012) 14–21.
  2. B.L. Phoon, C.C. Ong, M.S.M. Saheed, P.-L. Show, J.-S. Chang, T.C. Ling, S.S. Lam, J.C. Juan, Conventional and emerging technologies for removal of antibiotics from wastewater, J. Hazard. Mater., 400 (2020) 122961, doi:10.1016/j. jhazmat.2020.122961.
  3. Y. Jiang, X. Shi, H.Y. Ng, Aerobic granular sludge systems for treating hypersaline pharmaceutical wastewater: start-up, long-term performances and metabolic function, J. Hazard. Mater., 412 (2021) 125229, doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125229.
  4. M. Ahsani, H. Hazrati, M. Javadi, M. Ulbricht, R. Yegani, Preparation of antibiofouling nanocomposite
    PVDF/Ag-SiO2 membrane and long-term performance evaluation in the MBR system fed by real pharmaceutical wastewater, Sep. Purif. Technol., 249 (2020) 116938, doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2020.116938.
  5. J.C. Leyva-Diaz, M.D. Munio, M. Fenice, J.M. Poyatos, Respirometric method for kinetic modeling of ammoniumoxidizing and nitrite-oxidizing bacteria in a membrane bioreactor, AICHE J., 66 (2020) e16271, doi:10.1002/aic.16271.
  6. J. Teng, L. Shen, Y. Xu, Y. Chen, X.-L. Wu, Y. He, J. Chen, H. Lin, Effects of molecular weight distribution of soluble microbial products (SMPs) on membrane fouling in a membrane bioreactor (MBR): novel mechanistic insights, Chemosphere, 248 (2020) 126013, doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126013.
  7. T. Liu, C. Dang, Application of MBR for upgrading and reconstruction of WWTP, Chinese, China Water Wastewater, 33 (2017) 92–94.
  8. C. Echevarria, C. Valderrama, J.L. Cortina, I. Martin, M. Arnaldos, X. Bernat, A. De la Cal, M.R. Boleda, A. Vega, A. Teuler, E. Castellvi, Techno-economic evaluation and comparison of PAC-MBR and ozonation-UV revamping for organic micro-pollutants removal from urban reclaimed wastewater, Sci. Total Environ., 671 (2019) 288–298.
  9. D. Kim, Y. Cho, K. McKennon, G. Lowe, S. Jung, J. Kim, A successful transformation of conventional SBR to MBR at Indian casino and facility: a case study of Chumash Casino and Resort Water Reclamation Facility (WRF), water reuse perspectives, Environ. Earth Sci., 76 (2017) 578, doi: 10.1007/ s12665-017-6900-6.
  10. H. Hamedi, M. Ehteshami, S.A. Mirbagheri, S. Zendehboudi, New deterministic tools to systematically investigate fouling occurrence in membrane bioreactors, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 144 (2019) 334–353.
  11. K.M. Lee, H. Doan, F. Ein-Mozaffari, Intermittent ultrasoundassisted ceramic membrane fouling control in ultrafiltration, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 98 (2020) 1648–1667.
  12. A. Brookes, B. Jefferson, G. Guglielmi, S.J. Judd, Sustainable flux fouling in a membrane bioreactor: impact of flux and MLSS, Sep. Sci. Technol., 41 (2006) 1279–1291.
  13. Y. Jeong, Y. Kim, Y. Jin, S. Hong, C. Park, Comparison of filtration and treatment performance between polymeric and ceramic membranes in anaerobic membrane bioreactor treatment of domestic wastewater, Sep. Purif. Technol., 199 (2018) 182–188.
  14. S.Y. Kim, H.A. Garcia, C.M. Lopez-Vazquez, C. Milligan, A. Herrera, M. Matosic, J. Curko, D. Brdjanovic, Oxygen transfer performance of a supersaturated oxygen aeration system (SDOX) evaluated at high biomass concentrations, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 139 (2020) 171–181.
  15. K. Poojamnong, K. Tungsudjawong, W. Khongnakorn, P. Jutaporn, Characterization of reversible and irreversible foulants in membrane bioreactor (MBR) for eucalyptus pulp and paper mill wastewater treatment using fluorescence regional integration, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 8 (2020) 104231, doi:10.1016/j.jece.2020.104231.
  16. S. Sun, Y. Song, X.J. Yang, H. Hu, S. Wu, W.-K. Qi, Y.-Y. Li, Strategies for improving nitrogen removal under high sludge loading rate in an anammox membrane bioreactor operated at 25°C, Chem. Eng. Sci., 183 (2018) 106–114.
  17. M. Chtourou, M. Mallek, M. Dalmau, J. Mamo, E. Santos-Clotas, A. Ben Salah, K. Walha, V. Salvado, H. Monchlus, Triclosan, carbamazepine and caffeine removal by activated sludge system focusing on membrane bioreactor, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 118 (2018) 1–9.
  18. J. Wen, M.W. LeChevallier, W. Tao, Y. Liu, Nitrous oxide emission and microbial community of full-scale anoxic/ aerobic membrane bioreactors at low dissolved oxygen setpoints, J. Water Process Eng., 38 (2020) 101654, doi: 10.1016/j. jwpe.2020.101654.
  19. X. Yan, S. Zheng, D. Qiu, J. Yang, Y. Han, Z. Huo, X. Su, J. Sun, Characteristics of N2O generation within the internal microenvironment of activated sludge flocs under different dissolved oxygen concentrations, Bioresour. Technol., 291 (2019) 121867, doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121867.
  20. H. Yao, H. Dong, X. Tao, B. Shang, Y. Liu, Operation parameter optimization of wastewater from swine farms using submerged membrane bioreactor, Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng., 31 (2015) 223–230.
  21. S. Chen, D. Yang, B. Dong, N. Li, X. Dai, Sludge age impacted the distribution, occurrence state and structure of organic compounds in activated sludge and affected the anaerobic degradability, Chem. Eng. J., 384 (2020) 123261, doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.123261.
  22. M. Zhang, M. Yu, Y. Wang, C. He, J. Pang, J. Wu, Operational optimization of a three-stage nitrification moving bed biofilm reactor (NMBBR) by obtaining enriched nitrifying bacteria: nitrifying performance, microbial community, and kinetic parameters, Sci. Total Environ., 697 (2019) 134101, doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134101.
  23. H.C. Teck, K.S. Loong, D.D. Sun, J.O. Leckie, Influence of a prolonged solid retention time environment on nitrification/ denitrification and sludge production in a submerged membrane bioreactor, Desalination, 245 (2009) 28–43.
  24. V. Singh, N.D. Pandey, A comparison of performance of ADM1 and monod model treating low strength wastewater, Mater. Today:. Proc., 3 (2016) 4157–4162.
  25. P. Xu, Analytical solution for a hybrid Logistic-Monod cell growth model in batch and continuous stirred tank reactor culture, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 117 (2020) 873–878.