References

1. D. Abdessemd, G. Nezzal and R. Ben Aim, Fraction of a secondary effluent with membrane separation, Desalination, 146 (2002) 433-437.
2. J. Haberkamp, A.S. Ruhl, M. Ernst and M. Jekel, Impact of coagulation and adsorption on DOC fractions of secondary effluent and resulting fouling behavior in ultrafiltration, Water Res., 41 (2007) 3794-3802.
3. M. Mietten-Peuchot and R. Ben Aim, Improvement of crossflow microfiltration performance with flocculation, Proc. 5th World Filtration Congress, Nice, 1990, pp. 488-493.
4. X. Wang, L. Wang, Y. Liu and W. Duan, Ozonzation pretreatment of ultrafiltration of the secondary effluent,
   J. Membr. Sci., 287 (2007) 187-191.
5. T.E. Doll and F.H. Frimmel, Removal of selected persistent organic pollutants by heterogeneous photocatalysis in water, Catal. Today, 101 (2005) 195-202.
6. X. Huang, M. Leal and Q. Li, Degradation of natural organic matter by TiO₂ photocatalytic oxidation and its effect on fouling of low-pressure membranes, Water Res., 42 (2008) 1142-1150.
7. S. Mozia, M. Tomaszewska and A.W. Morawski, A new photocatalytic membrane reactor (PMR) for removal of azo-dye acid red 18 from water, Appl. Catal. B Environ., 59 (2005) 131-137.
8. A.A. Lee, K.H. Choo, C.H. Lee, H.I. Lee, T. Hyeon, W. Choi and H.H. Kwon, Use of ultrafiltration membranes for the separation of TiO₂ photocatalysts in drinking water treatment, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 40 (2001) 1712-1719.
9. R. Molinari, F. Pirillo, V. Loddo and L. Palmisano, Heterogeneous photocatalytic degradation of pharmaceuticals in water by using polycrystalline TiO₂ and a nanofiltration membrane reactor, Catal. Today, 118 (2006) 205-213.
10. A.F. Turbak, Non-woven: Theory, Process, Performance, and Testing, Tappi Press, Atlanta Georgia, 1993.
11. M.C. Chang, R.Y. Horng, H. Shao and Y.J. Hu, Performance and filtration characteristics of non-woven membranes used in submerged membrane bioreactor for synthetic wastewater treatment, Desalination, 191 (2006) 8-15.
12. R.Y. Horng, H. Shao, W.K. Chang and M.C. Chang, The feasibility study of using non-woven MBR for reduction of hydrolyzed biosolids, Water Sci. Technol., 54 (5) (2006) 85-90.
13. M.C. Chang, R.Y. Horng, H. Shao and Y.J. Hu, Separation of titanium dioxide from photocatalytically treated water by non-woven fabric membrane, Filtration, 6 (4) (2006) 340-344.
14. R.Y. Horng, M.C. Chang, H. Shao, Y.J. Hu and C.P. Huang, The usage of non-woven fabric materials as separation media in submerged membrane photocatalytic reactor for degradation of organic pollutants in water, Separation Sci. Technol, 42 (2007) 1381-1390.
15. X. Zheng, R. Mehrez, M. Jekel and M. Ernst, Bio-filtration of treated domestic wastewater as a pretreatment to ultrafiltration: effect on protein and polysaccharide related fouling, The 4th IWA International Membrane Conference Membranes for Water and Wastewater Treatment, Harrogate, UK, 2007.
16. R.Y. Horng, M.C. Chang, H. Shao, Y.J. Hu and C.P. Huang, Application of TiO₂ photocatalytic oxidation and non-woven membrane filtration hybrid system for degradation of 4-chorophenol, Desalination, accepted for publication.
17. S. Rosenberger, H. Evenblij, S.T. Poele, T. Wintgens and C. Laabs, The importance of liquid phase analyses to understand fouling in membrane assisted activated sludge process-six case studies of different European research groups, J. Membr. Sci., 263 (2005) 113-126.
18. S. Lee and C.H. Lee, Effect of membrane properties and pretreatment on flux and NOM rejection in surface water nanofiltration, Separation Purif. Technol., 56 (2007) 1-8.
19. R. Molinari, M. Mungari, E. Drioli, A. Di Paola,V. Loddo, L. Palisano and M. Schiavello, Study on a photocatalytic membrane reactor for water purification. Catal. Today, 55 (2000) 71-78.