References

  1. US. EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). Our built and natural environments: a technical review of the interactions between land use, transportation, and environmental quality; 2001(4). https://www.epa.gov/smartgrowth/ our-built-and-natural-environments.
  2. A.H. Elliott, S.A. Trowsdale, A review of models for low impact urban stormwater drainage, Environ. Mod. soft., 22 (2007) 394–405.
  3. D.B. Jennings, S.T. Jarnagin, Changes in anthropogenic impervious surfaces, precipitation and daily streamflow discharge: a historical perspective in a mid-Atlantic subwatershed, Landscape Ecol., 17 (2002) 471.
  4. M.C. Maniquiz, S.Y. Lee, L.H. Kim, Long-term monitoring of infiltration trench for nonpoint source pollution control, Water Air Soil Pollut., 212 (2010) 13–26.
  5. T.D. Fletcher, H. Andrieu, P. Hamel, Understanding, management and modelling of urban hydrology and its consequences for receiving waters: A state of the art, Adv. Water Resour., 51 (2013) 261–279.
  6. T.J. Wright, Y. Liu, N.J. Carroll, L.M. Ahiablame, B.A. Engel, Retrofitting LID practices into existing neighborhoods: is it worth it?. Environ. Manag., 57 (2016) 856–867.
  7. M.N. Danfoura, J.J Gurdak, Redox dynamics and oxygen reduction rates of infiltrating urban stormwater beneath low impact development (LID), Water, 8 (2016) 435.
  8. A.J.M. kuss, J.J. Gurdak, Groundwater level response in U.S. principal aquifers to ENSO, NAO, PDO, and AMO, J. Hydrol., 519 (2014) 1939–1952.
  9. L.S. Coffman, Low-impact development: an alternative stormwater management technology. Handbook of water sensitive planning and design. Maryland: France RL. 97, 2002.
  10. J.J. Gurdak, R.T. Hanson, T.R. Green, Effects of Climate Variability and Change on Groundwater Resources of the United States; U.S. Geological Survey: Lakewood, CO, USA, 2009.
  11. T.R. Schueler, Controlling runoff: A practical Manual for Planning and designing Urban BPMs, Department of Environmental program, Metropolitan Washington Council of Govenments, Washington, DC, 1987.
  12. D.B. Booth, C.R. Jackson, Urbanization of aquatic systems: degradation thresholds, stormwater detection, and the limits of mitigation, J. AWWA, 33 (1997) 1077.
  13. W.F. Hunt, W.G. Lord, Urban Waterways: Bioretention performance, design, construction, and maintenance. North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service. AGW-588-05, 2006.
  14. A.P. Davis, Field performance of bioretention: Hydrology impacts, J. Hydrol. Eng., 13 (2008) 90.
  15. E.A. Fassman, S.J. Blackbourn, Urban runoff mitigation by a permeable pavement system over impermeable soils, Hydrol. Eng., 2010.
  16. B.G. Gregoire, J.C. Clausen, Effect of a modular extensive green roof on stormwater runoff and water quality, Ecol. Eng., 37 (2011) 963.
  17. L.M. Ahiablame, B.A. Engel, Chaubey, Effectiveness of low impact development practices: literature review and suggestions for future research, Water Air Soil Pollut., 223 (2012) 4253–4273.
  18. J.K. McNett, W.F. Hunt, A.P. Davis, Influent pollutant concentrations as predictors of effluent pollutant concentrations for mid-Atlantic bioretention, J. Environ. Eng., 137 (2011) 790–799.
  19. C.Y. Guo, Preservation of watershed regime for low impact development, 2009.
  20. A.P. Davis, Green engineering principles promote low-impact development, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39 (2005) 338–445.
  21. DOD (Department of Defense). The low impact development manual, 2004: http://www.lowimpactdevelopment.org/ lid%20articles/ufc_3_210_10.pdf.
  22. W.F. Hunt, R.G. Traver, A.P. Davis, C.H. Emerson, K.A. Collins, J.H. Stagge, Low impact development practices: designing to infiltrate in urban environments. Effects of urbanization on groundwater: an engineering case-based approach for sustainable development, (2010) 308–343.
  23. W.F. Hunt, L.L Szpi, Urban waterways, permeable pavements, green roofs and cisterns, stormwater treatment practices for low-impact development. NC State University and NC A&T University Cooperative Extension, 2006.
  24. A.P. Davis, W.F. Hunt, R.G. Traver, M. Clar, Bioretention technology: Overview of current practice and future needs. J, Environ. Eng., 135 (2009) 109–117.
  25. J. Liu, D.J. Sample, C. Bell, Y. Guan, Review and research needs of bioretention used for the treatment of urban stormwater, Water, 6 (2014) 1069–1099.
  26. CEI (Comprehensive Environmental Inc.). City of Nashua, New Hampshire alternative stormwater management methods planning and guidance. Final Report, Part 1, March 2003.
  27. D.C. Penniman, M. Hostetler, T. Borisova, G. Acomb, Capital cost comparisons between low impact development (LID) and conventional stormwater management systems in Florida, Suburban Sustain., 2 (2013) 1.
  28. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Reducing Storm water Costs through Low Impact Development (LID) Strategies and Practices, EPA 841-F-07-006, December, 2007.
  29. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Case Studies Analyzing the Economic Benefits of Low Impact Development and Green Infrastructure Programs, EPA 841-R-13-004, August 2013.
  30. CNT (Center for Neighborhood Technology, The Value of Green Infrastructure: A Guide to Recognizing Its Economic, Environmental and Social Benefits. Center for Neighborhood Technology, 2010. Available: http://www.cnt.org/repository/ gi-values-guide.pdf. Accessed 11/7/2016.
  31. A.J. Reese, Volume-based hydrology, Stormwater, 10 (2009) 54–67.
  32. T.N. Debo, A. Reese, Municipal Stormwater Management. CRC Press; 2002.
  33. Chartzoulakis, Konstantinos, M. Bertaki, Sustainable water management in agriculture under climate change, Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia., 4 (2015) 88–98.
  34. Danfoura, N. Mays, J. Jason, Gurdak, Redox Dynamics and oxygen reduction rates of infiltrating urban stormwater beneath low impact development (LID), Water, 10 (2016) 435.
  35. N.C.B. Moura, P.R.M. Pellegrino, J.R.S. Martins, Best management practices as an alternative for flood and urban storm water control in a changing climate, J. Flood Risk Manag., (2015).
  36. C.A. Zimmer, I.W. Heathcote, H.R. Whiteley, H. Schroter, Low-impact-development practices for stormwater: implications for urban hydrology, Canadian Water Res. J., 33 (2007) 193–213.
  37. S. Lloyd, Water sensitive urban design in the Australian context, 2001.
  38. M. Scholz, P. Grabowiecki, Review of permeable pavement systems, Build Environ., 42 (2007) 3830–3836.
  39. D. Pezzaniti, S. Beecham, J. Kandasamy, Influence of clogging on the effective life of permeable pavements, Proc ICE-Water Manage., 2009.
  40. C. Miller, Vegetated Roof Covers, A New Method for Controlling runoff in Urbanized areas, Proceedings from the 1998 Pennsylvania Stormwater Management Symposium, Villanova University, 1998.
  41. L. Bengtsson, Peak flows from thin sedum-moss roof, Nord. Hydrol., 36 (2005) 269–280.
  42. M. Köehler, Urban storm water management by extensive green roofs, In Proceedings of the World Green Roof Congress/ Welt Gründach-Kongress, Basel, Switzerland, September 2005.
  43. K. Scholtz-Barth, Green roofs: Storm water management from the top down, Environ. Design and Construction 2001.
  44. S.C. Centgraf, M. Schmidt, Water management to save energy. A decentralized approach to an integrated sustainable urban development, In Proceedings of the Rio5- World Climate and Energy Event, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, February 2005.
  45. E.S. Prowell, An analysis of storm water retention and detention pf modular green roof blocks, Master of Science Thesis, University of Georgia, USA, 2006.
  46. N.D. Van Woert, D.B. Rowe, J.A. Andresen, C.L. Rugh, R.T. Fernandez, L. Xiao, Green roof stormwater retention: effects of roof surface, slope and media depth, J. Environ. Qual., 34 (2005) 1036–1044.
  47. T.L. Carter, C.R. Jackson, Vegetated roofs for storm water management at multiple spatial scales, Landsc. Urban Plan., 80 (2007) 84–94.
  48. D. Hutchinson, P. Abrams, R. Retzlaff, T. Liptan, Storm water monitoring two ecoroofs in Portland, Oregon, USA, In Proceedings of the Greening Rooftops for Sustainable Communities, Chicago, IL, USA, May 2003.
  49. A. Moran, B. Hunt, J. Smith, Hydrologic and water quality performance from greenroofs in Goldsboro and Raleigh, North Carolina, In Proceedings of the Greening Rooftops for Sustainable Communities, Washington, D.C., USA, May 2005.
  50. A. Palla, I. Gnecco, L.G. Lanza, Hydrologic restoration in the urban environment using green roofs, Water, 2 (2010) 140– 154.
  51. D. Roehr, Y. Kong, Runoff reduction effects of green roofs in Vancouver, BC, Kelowna, BC, and Shanghai, PR China, Canad. Water Res., J. 35 (2010) 53–68.
  52. M. Shafique, R. Kim, D. Lee, The potential of green-blue roof to manage storm water in urban areas, Nature Environ. Poll. Tech., 15 (2016) 715.
  53. GRRP (Green Roof Research Program), The Green roof research program at Michigan State University, 2010. http:// www.hrt.msu.edu/greenroof/#Green%20 Roof%20.
  54. F. Bianchini, K. Hewage, how “green” are the green roofs? Lifecycle analysis of green roof materials, Build. Environ., 48 (2012) 57–65.
  55. D.B. Rowe, Green roofs as a means of pollution abatement, Environ Pollut., 159 (2011) 2100–2111.
  56. S. Alsup, S. Ebbs, W. Retzlaff, The exchangeability and leachability of metals from select green roof growth substrates, Urban Eco., 13 (2010) 91–111.
  57. J.C. Berndtsson, T. Emilsson, L. Bengtsson, The influence of extensive vegetated roofs on runoff water quality, Sci. Total Environ., 355 (2006) 48–53.
  58. M.E. Diet, Low impact development practices: A review of current research and recommendations for future directions, Water Air Soil Pollut., 186 (2007) 351–363.
  59. K. Vijayaraghavan, U.M. Joshi, R. Balasubramanian, A field study to evaluate runoff quality from green roofs, Water Res., 46 (2012) 1337–1345.
  60. M. Shafique, D. Lee, R. Kim, A field study to evaluate runoff quantity from blue roof and green blue roof in an urban area, Inter. J. Control Auto, 9 (2016) 59–68.
  61. P.G. County, Design manual for use of bioretention in stormwater management, 1993. http://water.epa.gov/polwaste/ npdes/swbmp/Bioretention-Rain-Gardens.cfm.
  62. X. Sun, A.P. Davis, Heavy metal fates in laboratory bioretention systems, Chemosphere, 66 (2007) 1601–1609.
  63. R. Brown, W. Hunt, Bioretention Performance in the Upper Coastal Plain of North Carolina, In Low Impact Development for Urban Ecosystem and Habitat Protection, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston: VA, USA, (2008) 1–10.
  64. W. Hunt, J. Smith, S. Jadlocki, J. Hathaway, P. Eubanks, Pollutant removal and peak flow mitigation by a bioretention cell in urban Charlotte, N.C. J. Environ. Eng., 134 (2008) 403–408.
  65. R. Brown, W. Hunt, Underdrain configuration to enhance bioretention exfiltration to reduce pollutant loads, J. Environ. Eng., 137 (2011) 1082–1091.
  66. K. DeBusk, T. Wynn, Storm-water bioretention for runoff quality and quantity mitigation, J. Environ. Eng., 137 (2011) 800–808.
  67. J. Hathaway, W. Hunt, A. Graves, J. Wright, Field evaluation of Bioretention indicator bacteria sequestration in Wilmington, North Carolina, J. Environ. Eng., 137 (2011) 1103–1113.
  68. Trowsdale, A. Sam, R. Simcock, Urban stormwater treatment using bioretention, J. Hyd., 397 (2011) 167–174.
  69. U.T. Khan, C. Valeo, A. Chu, B. van Duin, Bioretention cell efficacy in cold climates: Part 2—water quality performance, Canad. J. Civil Eng., 39 (2012) 1222–1233.
  70. X.L. Chen, E. Peltier, B.S.M. Sturm, C.B. Young, Nitrogen removal and nitrifying and denitrifying bacteria quantification in a stormwater bioretention system, Water Res., 47 (2013) 1691–1700.
  71. J. Olszewski, A. Davis, Comparing the hydrologic performance of a bioretention cell with predevelopment values, J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 139 (2013) 124–130.
  72. M.E. Bakacs, S.E. Yergeau, C.C. Obropta, Assessment of car wash runoff treatment using bioretention mesocosms. J. Environ. Eng., 139 (2013) 1132–1136.
  73. F. Geronimo, F. Kevin, C. Marla, Maniquiz-Redillas, L.H Kim, Fate and removal of nutrients in bioretention systems, Desal. Water Treat., 53 (2015) 3072–3079.
  74. H. Guo, F.Y. Lim, Y. Zhang, Y. Lee, J.Y. Hu, S.L. Ong, G.S. Ong, Soil column studies on the performance evaluation of engineered soil mixes for bioretention systems, Desal. Water Treat., 54 (2015) 3661–3667.
  75. C.D. Houdeshel, K.R. Hultine, N.C. Johnson, C.A. Pomeroy, Evaluation of three vegetation treatments in bioretention gardens in a semi-arid climate, Lands. Urban Plan., 135 (2015) 62–72.
  76. C. Chapman, R.R. Horne, Performance assessment of a street-drainage bioretention system, Water Environ. Res., 82 (2010) 109–119.
  77. L. Zhang, E.A. Seagren, A.P. Davis, J.S. Karns, The capture and destruction of Escherichia coli from simulated urban runoff using conventional bioretention media and iron oxide-coated sand, Water Environ. Res., 82 (2010) 701–714.
  78. L. Zhang, E.A. Seagren, A.P. Davis, J.S. Karns, Long-term sustainability of Escherichia coli removal in conventional bioretention media, J. Environ, Eng., 137 (2011) 669–678.
  79. W. Zhang, G.O. Brown, D.E. Storm, Enhancement of heavy metals retention in sandy soil by amendment with fly ash, Trans ASABE., 51 (2008) 1247–1254.
  80. A.M. Hathaway, W.F. Hunt, J.D. Wright, S.J. Jadlocki, Field evaluation of indicator bacteria removal by stormwater BMPs in North Carolina, In World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2009@ sGreat Rivers, ASCE, 2009.
  81. R.A. Brown, F.H. William III, Impacts of construction activity on bioretention performance, J. Hydr. Eng., 15 (2009) 386–394.
  82. E.A. Dreelin, L. Fowler, C.R. Carroll, A test of porous pavement effectiveness on clay soils during natural storm events, Water Res., 340 (2006) 799–805.
  83. Bioretention manual. Landover, MD: Prince George’s County (MD) Government, Department of Environmental Protection, Watershed Protection Branch; 2002.
  84. M.K. Widomski, H. Sobczuk, W. Olszta, Sand-filled drainage ditches for erosion control: Effects on infiltration efficiency, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 74 (2010) 213–219.
  85. M. Abu-Zreig, A. Tamimi, Field evaluation of sand-ditch water harvesting technique in Jordan, Agricult Water Manage., 98 (2011) 1291–1296.
  86. J.T. Kirby, S.R. Durrans, R. Pitt, P.D. Johnson, Hydraulic resistance in grass swales designed for small flow conveyance, J. Hydraul. Eng., 131 (2005) 65–68.
  87. M.E. Barrett, P.M. Walsh, F. Joseph, J.r. Malina, R.J. Charbeneau, Performance of vegetative controls for treating highway runoff, J. Environ. Eng., 124 (1998) 1121–1128.
  88. Bedan, S. Erik, C.J. Clausen, Stormwater runoff quality and quantity from traditional and low impact development watersheds1. (2009).
  89. Stagge, H. James, A.P. Davis, Water Quality Benefits of Grass Swales in Managing Highway Runoff, Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation 2006.
  90. S. Fach, C. Engelhard, N. Wittke, W. Rauch, Performance of infiltration swales with regard to operation in winter times in an Alpine region, Water Sci. Technol. 63 (2011) 2658–2656.
  91. M. Bckstrm, Sediment transport in grassed swales during simulated runoff events, Water Sci. Technol., 45 (2002) 41–48.
  92. M. Backstro, Grassed swales for stormwater pollution control during rain and snowmelt, Water Sci. Technol., 48 (2003) 123–129.
  93. J. Zhao, Y. Zhao, X. Zhao, C. Jiang, Agricultural runoff pollution control by a grassed swale coupled with wetland detention ponds system: a case study in Taihu Basin, China, Environ. Sci. Poll. Res., 23 (2016) 9093–9104.
  94. M. Legret, V. Colandini, C. Le Marc, Effects of a porous pavement with reservoir structure on the quality of runoff water and soil, Sci. Total Environ., 189–190 (1996) 335–340.
  95. C. Dierkes, A. Holte, W.F. Geiger, Heavy metal retention within a porous pavement structure, Proc. the Eighth International Conference on Urban Storm Drainage. 1999.
  96. S. Fach, W.F. Geiger, Effective pollutant retention capacity of permeable pavements for infiltrated road runoffs determined by laboratory tests, Water Sci. Technol., 51 (2005) 37–45.
  97. K.A. Collins, W.F. Hunt, J.M. Hathaway, Hydrologic comparison of four types of permeable pavements and standard Asphalt in Eastern North Carolina, J. Hydrol. Eng., 13 (2008) 1146–1157.
  98. N. Jayasuriya, N. Kadurupokune, Comparative performance of permeable and porous pavements, in International Conference on Sustainable Built Environment (ICSBE-2010), December 13–14, Kandy, Sri Lanka 2010.
  99. E. Fassman, S. Blackbourne, Urban runoff mitigation by a permeable pavement system over impermeable soils, J. Hydrol. Eng., 15 (2010) 475–485.
  100. B. Myers, S. Beecham, J.A. van Leeuwen, Water quality with storage in permeable pavement basecourse, Proceedings of the ICE-Water Management, 2011.
  101. J. Mullaney, C. Jefferies, P. Rikalainen, Pollution profiling and particle size distribution within permeable paving units – with and without a geotextile, Manage. Environ. Qual., 23 (2012) 150–162.
  102. J. He, J. Huang, C. Valeo, A. Chu, Water Quality Treatment Efficacy Model of Porous Concrete Pavement. 2015.
  103. E.Z. Bean, W.F. Hunt, D.A. Bidelspach, Field survey of permeable pavement surface infiltration rates, J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 133 (2007) 249–255.
  104. K.A. Collins, W.F. Hunt, J.M. Hathaway, Side-by-side comparison of nitrogen species removal for four types of permeable pavement and standard asphalt in eastern North Carolina, J. Hydrol. Eng., 15 (2009) 512–519.
  105. A.P. Newman, C.J. Pratt, S.J. Coupe, N. Cresswell, Oil bio-degradation in permeable pavements by microbial communities, Innov. Techn. Urban Drain., 45 (2002) 51–59.
  106. B.O. Brattebo, D.B. Booth, Long-term stormwater quantity and quality performance of permeable pavement systems, Water Res., 37 (2003) 4369–4376.
  107. B.D. Booth, J. Leavitt, Field evaluation of permeable pavement systems for improved stormwater management, J. Am. Planning Assoc., 65 (1999) 314–321.
  108. B.T. Rushton, Low-impact parking lot design reduces runoff and pollutant loads, J. Water Res. Planning Manag., 127 (2001) 172–179.
  109. M. Kwiatkowski, A.L. Welker, R.G. Traver, M. Vanacore, T. Ladd, Evaluation of an infiltration best management practice utilizing pervious concrete, J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 2007.
  110. D.M. Abdel-Aziz, D.O. Al-Maani, A.I. Azhari W, Using Pervious Concrete for Managing Storm Water Run-off in Urban Neighborhoods: Case of Amman 2012.
  111. E.A. Thelen, Porous Pavement, The Franklin Institute Research Laboratories. 1978.
  112. G. Fitts, The new and improved open graded friction course mixes, Asphalt. 2002.
  113. B.K. Ferguson BK, Porous Pavements. Florida: CRC Press; 2005.
  114. M. Legret, V. Colandini, Effects of a porous pavement with reservoir structure on runoff water: water quality and fate of heavy metals, Water Sci. Technol., 39 (1999) 111–118.
  115. J.D. Balades, M. Legret, H. Madiec, Permeable pavements: Pollution management tools, Water Sci. Technol., 32 (1995) 49–65.
  116. T. Lucke, using drainage slots in permeable paving blocks to delay the effects of clogging: Proof of concept study, Water, 6 (2014) 2660–2671.
  117. R. Pitt, S. Clark, R. Field, Groundwater contamination potential from stormwater infiltration practices, Urban Water., 1 (1999) 217–226.
  118. G.M. Rusciano, C.C. Obropta, Efficiency of bioretention systems to reduce fecal coliform counts in stormwater. North American Surface Water Quality Conference and Exposition, Orlando, FL. July. 2005.
  119. S.S. Kaushal, P.M. Groffman, G.E. Likens, K.T Belt, W.P. Stack, V.R. Kelly, Increased salinization of fresh water in the northeastern United States, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 102 (2005) 13517–13520.
  120. Hall, J. Tanya, the triple bottom line: what is it and how does it work? Indiana business review, 86 (2011) 4.
  121. M. Kramer, Enhancing Sustainable Communities with Green Infrastructure. EPA 100-R-14-006. 2014. Available online: www.epa.gov/smartgrowth (accessed on 3 February 2017), 2014.
  122. Economics, G.L.A. Valuing Greenness-Green Spaces, House Prices and Londoners’ Priorities; Greater London Authority: London, UK, 2003.
  123. M. Mansor, I. Said, I. Mohamad, Experiential contacts with green infrastructure’s diversity and well-being of urban community, Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci., 49 (2012) 257–267.
  124. K.C. Desouza, T.H. Flanery, Designing, planning, and managing resilient cities: A conceptual framework, Cities, 35 (2013) 89–99.
  125. A. Guillette, Studio L.I.D. Achieving Sustainable Site Design through Low Impact Development Practices. 2010. Whole Building Design Guide (www.Wbdg.org).
  126. S. Dhalla, C. Zimmer, Low Impact Development Stormwater Management Planning and Design Guide. Stormwater Guide. Toronto: Toronto and Region Conservation Authority. 2010.
  127. L. Chelleri, H.W. Kua, J.P. Rodriguez Sanchez, K.M. Nahiduzzaman, G. Thondhlana, Are people responsive to a more sustainable, decentralized, and user-driven management of urban metabolism? Sustainabilit., 8 (2016) 275.
  128. J. Foster, A. Lowe, S. Winkelman, The value of green infrastructure for urban climate adaptation, Center Clean Air Policy, 750 (2011).
  129. M. Roseland, Toward sustainable communities: Solutions for citizens and their governments (Vol. 6). New Society Publishers. 2012.
  130. M.B. Molla, The value of urban green infrastructure and its environmental response in urban ecosystem: a literature review. Int. J. Environ. Sci., 4 (2015) 89.
  131. E. Andersson, S. Barthel, S. Borgström, J. Colding, T. Elmqvist, C. Folke, A. Gren, Reconnecting cities to the biosphere: stewardship of green infrastructure and urban ecosystem services, Ambio., 43 (2014) 445–453.
  132. L. Pearson, P. Newton, P. Roberts, Resilient Sustainable Cities: A Future, Routledge: Oxford, UK, 2014.
  133. B. Krause, H. Culmsee, K. Wesche, E. Bergmeier, C. Leuschner, Habitat loss of floodplain meadows in north Germany since the 1950s, Biod. Cons., 20 (2011) 2347–2364.
  134. R. Jones, J. Symons, C. Young, Assessing the Economic Value of Green Infrastructure: Green Paper, 2015.
  135. D. Gallet, The Value of Green Infrastructure: A Guide to Recognizing Its Economic, Environmental and Social Benefits. Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation, 2011.
  136. A. Hall, “Green infrastructure case studies: municipal policies for managing stormwater with Green Infrastructure.” Retrieved from United States Environmental Protection Agency: http://rfcd.pima.gov/pdd/lid/pdfs/40-usepa-gi-casestudies-2010.pdf (2010).
  137. R. Frederick, R. Fernando Pasquel, Hunter J. Loftin. Overcoming Barriers to Implementation of LID Practices. Low Impact Development Technology: Implementation and Economics: LID: Implementation and Economics. 2015.
  138. D. Godwin, B. Parry, F. Burris, S. Chan, A. Punton, Barriers and opportunities for low impact development: case studies from three Oregon Communities. Oregon Sea Grant: Corvallis, OR 2008.
  139. M. Shafique, A review of the bioretention system for sustainable storm water management in urban areas, Mater. Geoenviron., 63 (2016) 227–236.
  140. J.R. Vogel, T.L. Moore, R.R. Coffman, S.N. Rodie, S.L. Hutchinson, K.R. McDonough, J.T. McMaine, Critical review of technical questions facing low impact development and green infrastructure: A perspective from the Great Plains, Water Environ. Res., 87 (2015) 849–862.
  141. Y. Jiang, Y. Yuan, H. Piza, A review of applicability and effectiveness of low impact development/green infrastructure practices in arid/semi-arid United States Environ., 2 (2015) 221–249.