References

  1. M.M. Pendergast, E.M. Hoek, A review of water treatment membrane nanotechnologies, Energy Environ. Sci., 4 (2011) 1946–1971.
  2. M.D. Williams, M. Pirbazari, Membrane bioreactor process for removing biodegradable organic matter from water, Water Res., 41 (2007) 3880–3893.
  3. K. Akamatsu, W. Lu, T. Sugawara, S.-i. Nakao, Development of a novel fouling suppression system in membrane bioreactors using an intermittent electric field, Water Res., 44 (2010) 825–830.
  4. S. Gabarrón, G. Ferrero, M. Dalmau, J. Comas, I. Rodriguez-Roda, Assessment of energy-saving strategies and operational costs in full-scale membrane bioreactors, J. Environ. Manage., 134 (2014) 8–14.
  5. G. Di Bella, M. Torregrossa, Foaming in membrane bioreactors: identification of the causes, J. Environ. Manage., 128 (2013) 453–461.
  6. N. Lesage, M. Sperandio, C. Cabassud, Study of a hybrid process: adsorption on activated carbon/membrane bioreactor for the treatment of an industrial wastewater, Chem. Eng. Process., 47 (2008) 303–307.
  7. D. Kwon, H. Chang, H. Seo, J. Kim, Fouling behavior and system performance in membrane bioreactor introduced by granular media as a mechanical cleaning effect on membranes, Desal. Wat. Treat., 57 (2016) 9018–9026.
  8. A. Pollice, C. Giordano, G. Laera, D. Saturno, G. Mininni, Physical characteristics of the sludge in a complete retention membrane bioreactor, Water Res., 41 (2007) 1832–1840.
  9. P. Le-Clech, B. Jefferson, S. Judd, A comparison of submerged and sidestream tubular membrane bioreactor configurations, Desalination, 173 (2005) 113–122.
  10. S. Rosenberger, C. Laabs, B. Lesjean, R. Gnirss, G. Amy, M. Jekel, J.-C. Schrotter, Impact of colloidal and soluble organic material on membrane performance in membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment, Water Res., 40 (2006) 710–720.
  11. J. Gil, P. Krzeminski, J. Van Lier, J. Van Der Graaf, T. Wijffels, D. Prats, Analysis of the filterability in industrial MBRs. Influence of activated sludge parameters and constituents on filterability, J. Membr. Sci., 385 (2011) 96–109.
  12. P. Karaolia, I. Michael-Kordatou, E. Hapeshi, J. Alexander, T. Schwartz, D. Fatta-Kassinos, Investigation of the potential of a Membrane BioReactor followed by solar Fenton oxidation to remove antibiotic-related microcontaminants, Chem. Eng. J., 310 (2017) 491–502.
  13. R. Aryal, M. Johir, S. Vigneswaran, J. Kandasamy, R. Sleigh, Performance of a stainless steel membrane in membrane bioreactor process, Desal. Wat. Treat., 41 (2012) 258–264.
  14. J. Huang, Z. Wang, J. Zhang, X. Zhang, J. Ma, Z. Wu, A novel composite conductive microfiltration membrane and its antifouling performance with an external electric field in membrane bioreactors, Sci. Rep., 5 (2015) 1–8.
  15. J. Martín-Pascual, P. Reboleiro-Rivas, M.M. Muñio, J. González- López, J.M. Poyatos, Membrane fouling of a hybrid moving bed membrane bioreactor plant to treat real urban wastewater, Chem. Eng. Process., 104 (2016) 112–119.
  16. J. Guo, W. Guan, S. Xia, Membrane fouling of hybrid submerged membrane bioreactor (hMBR) in treating municipal wastewater, Desal. Wat. Treat., 52 (2014) 6858–6867.
  17. C. Zhao, X. Xu, J. Chen, G. Wang, F. Yang, Highly effective antifouling performance of PVDF/graphene oxide composite membrane in membrane bioreactor (MBR) system, Desalination, 340 (2014) 59–66.
  18. T.-H. Bae, T.-M. Tak, Preparation of TiO2 self-assembled polymeric nanocomposite membranes and examination of their fouling mitigation effects in a membrane bioreactor system, J. Membr. Sci., 266 (2005) 1–5.
  19. T. Jiang, H. Zhang, D. Gao, F. Dong, J. Gao, F. Yang, Fouling characteristics of a novel rotating tubular membrane bioreactor, Chem. Eng. Process., 62 (2012) 39–46.
  20. M. Aslan, Y. Saatçi, Ö. Hanay, H. Hasar, Membrane fouling control in anaerobic submerged membrane bioreactor, Desal. Wat. Treat., 52 (2014) 7520–7530.
  21. J.K. Shim, H.S. Na, Y.M. Lee, H. Huh, Y.C. Nho, Surface modification of polypropylene membranes by γ-ray induced graft copolymerization and their solute permeation characteristics, J. Membr. Sci., 190 (2001) 215–226.
  22. H. Yamagishi, J.V. Crivello, G. Belfort, Development of a novel photochemical technique for modifying poly (arylsulfone) ultrafiltration membranes, J. Membr. Sci., 105 (1995) 237–247.
  23. I. Gancarz, G. Poźniak, M. Bryjak, Modification of polysulfone membranes 1. CO2 plasma treatment, Eur. Polym. J., 35 (1999) 1419–1428.
  24. M. Ulbricht, G. Belfort, Surface modification of ultrafiltration membranes by low temperature plasma II. Graft polymerization onto polyacrylonitrile and polysulfone, J. Membr. Sci., 111 (1996) 193–215.
  25. J.-E. An, G.W. Jeon, Y.G. Jeong, Preparation and properties of polypropylene nanocomposites reinforced with exfoliated graphene, Fibers Polym., 13 (2012) 507–514.
  26. N. Pasquini, Polypropylene Handbook, Middle East, (2005) 254–256.
  27. J. Pieracci, J.V. Crivello, G. Belfort, Increasing membrane permeability of UV-modified poly (ether sulfone) ultrafiltration membranes, J. Membr. Sci., 202 (2002) 1–16.
  28. I. Kim, J. Choi, T. Tak, Sulfonated polyethersulfone by heterogeneous method and its membrane performances, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 74 (1999) 2046–2055.
  29. H.-Y. Yu, M.-X. Hu, Z.-K. Xu, J.-L. Wang, S.-Y. Wang, Surface modification of polypropylene microporous membranes to improve their antifouling property in MBR: NH3 plasma treatment, Sep. Purif. Technol., 45 (2005) 8–15.
  30. G. Wu, S. Gan, L. Cui, Y. Xu, Preparation and characterization of PES/TiO2 composite membranes, Appl. Surf. Sci., 254 (2008) 7080–7086.
  31. L. Liu, C. Zhao, F. Yang, TiO2 and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) coated polyester filter in bioreactor for wastewater treatment, Water Res., 46 (2012) 1969–1978.
  32. M. Homayoonfal, M.R. Mehrnia, S. Rahmani, Y.M. Mojtahedi, Fabrication of alumina/polysulfone nanocomposite membranes with biofouling mitigation approach in membrane bioreactors, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 22 (2015) 357–367.
  33. T.-H. Bae, T.-M. Tak, Effect of TiO2 nanoparticles on fouling mitigation of ultrafiltration membranes for activated sludge filtration, J. Membr. Sci., 249 (2005) 1–8.
  34. G. Gesan-Guiziou, R. Wakeman, G. Daufin, Stability of latex crossflow filtration: cake properties and critical conditions of deposition, Chem. Eng. J., 85 (2002) 27–34.
  35. M. Ahsani, R. Yegani, Study on the fouling behavior of silica nanocomposite modified polypropylene membrane in purification of collagen protein, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 102 (2015) 261–273.
  36. B. Luo, Z. Li, J. Zhang, X. Wang, Formation of anisotropic microporous isotactic polypropylene (iPP) membrane via thermally induced phase separation, Desalination, 233 (2008) 19–31.
  37. M. Mulder, Basic Principles of Membrane Technology, Springer Science & Business Media, The Netherlands, 1996.
  38. J. Hermia, Constant pressure blocking filtration law application to powder-law non-Newtonian fluid, Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng., 60 (1982) 183–187.
  39. C. Rai, P. Rai, G. Majumdar, S. De, S. DasGupta, Mechanism of permeate flux decline during microfiltration of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) juice, Food Bioprocess Technol., 3 (2010) 545–553.
  40. G. Bolton, D. LaCasse, R. Kuriyel, Combined models of membrane fouling: development and application to microfiltration and ultrafiltration of biological fluids, J. Membr. Sci., 277 (2006) 75–84.
  41. W.R. Bowen, J.I. Calvo, A. Hernández, Steps of membrane blocking in flux decline during protein microfiltration, J. Membr. Sci., 101 (1995) 153–165.
  42. H.H. Fang, X. Shi, Pore fouling of microfiltration membranes by activated sludge, J. Membr. Sci., 264 (2005) 161–166.
  43. Y. Jafarzadeh, R. Yegani, Analysis of fouling mechanisms in TiO2 embedded high density polyethylene membranes for collagen separation, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 93 (2015) 684–695.
  44. F. Shi, J. Ma, P. Wang, Y. Ma, Effect of quenching temperatures on the morphological and crystalline properties of PVDF and PVDF–TiO2 hybrid membranes, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng., 43 (2012) 980–988.
  45. V. Vatanpour, S.S. Madaeni, A.R. Khataee, E. Salehi, S. Zinadini, H.A. Monfared, TiO2 embedded mixed matrix PES nanocomposite membranes: influence of different sizes and types of nanoparticles on antifouling and performance, Desalination, 292 (2012) 19–29.
  46. F.S. Dehkordi, M. Pakizeh, M. Namvar-Mahboub, Properties and ultrafiltration efficiency of cellulose acetate/organically modified Mt (CA/OMMt) nanocomposite membrane for humic acid removal, Appl. Clay Sci., 105 (2015) 178–185.
  47. P. Le-Clech, V. Chen, T.A. Fane, Fouling in membrane bioreactors used in wastewater treatment, J. Membr. Sci., 284 (2006) 17–53.
  48. V. Chen, K. Kim, A. Fane, Effect of membrane morphology and operation on protein deposition in ultrafiltration membranes, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 47 (1995) 174–180.
  49. K. Kim, V. Chen, A. Fane, Some factors determining protein aggregation during ultrafiltration, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 42 (1993) 260–265.